well technically if u were rich u could pay to look beautiful, but in a plastic fake way........and if ur beautiful but poor.. welll some wonderful handsom millionere might find u and make u his wife, so ill take the beautiful and poor!!! x
2007-06-18 05:34:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I guess rich but ugly. There are a lot of people who would never be considered beautiful but have enough money to have various surgeries to make themselves more attractive. Unless, of course, you're talking about inner beauty and ugliness. Then, I'd much rather be poor but beautiful.
2007-06-18 05:29:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by Two Lips 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Poor but beautiful
2007-06-18 05:48:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by marsh 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Poor but beautiful.
2007-06-18 05:30:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
poor but beautiful!
2007-06-18 05:45:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by ....FED UP............ 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
poor and beautiful rich people dont know how to do anything on there own they always have someone else doing it for them....
2007-06-18 05:29:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by angie 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Rich and ugly - there's a particular face guy in L.A. that make a toad look like a goddess, but he's expensive.
2007-06-18 05:28:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by wwhrd 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Poor and beautiful, becuase money isnt everything.
2007-06-18 05:28:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Inbetween is best. But if I had to choose...Poor but beautiful.
2007-06-18 05:28:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by Confusion With a K 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
poor and beautiful...I like the way i am
2007-06-18 05:27:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 6
·
1⤊
0⤋