I am not sure exactly when the war/liberation of Iraq became an invasion, but it scares me to think of how such a play on words can affect the emotions of the people. .
2007-06-18 04:44:05 · 9 answers · asked by vinsa1981 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
So the UN resolutions that Iraq did not follow were BS? The WMDs that Clinton even claimed that iraq had and were building more of were no existant?!?
2007-06-18 04:51:38 · update #1
If it were all about the oil, why are the gas prices so high now? Don't you think that the cost would be lower because the supply is higher?
2007-06-18 04:52:35 · update #2
That is the typical type of ploy used by our biased anti-American media to swing a debate against an independent thinking society.
You, on the other hand, have the ability to think and not be swayed by specious arguments.
The bulk of the population of Iraq was overjoyed to see the removal of the tyrannical regime ruining their lives.
The performance of our administration as regards the reestablishment of a new and stable government has, so far, been a failure. It is getting to a point where many citizens of Iraq would like us to leave, but that does NOT constitute an invasion.
2007-06-18 04:59:48 · answer #1 · answered by Philip H 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Socialism is in which the nation's govt controls all creation and items distribution. It's an fiscal procedure. There can also be freedom of movement in Socialism, however economically you're a slave to the federal government given that they manipulate the distribution of wealth inside the nation. Communism is in which the nation's govt owns the whole lot and hence has complete manipulate over the whole lot. Typically the fiscal procedure in a Communist nation will comply with Socialist standards. In Communism the federal government can without problems immediately manipulate each element of your lifestyles. What companies can also be opened, what they may be able to promote, how so much you'll be able to make, what media can reward, what faculties can educate, what Internet entry persons may have, and so on. Fascism is in which the federal government practically manufactures excuses for imposing insurance policies to manipulate and avoid the populace. Fascism presents the phantasm of freedom. You could have freedom on paper however actually all the oblique regulations and regulations avoid you from exercise that freedom. Example: Restricting car option through immoderate selective taxing or rules on automakers within the title of shielding the atmosphere could be a fascist coverage.
2016-09-05 20:04:52 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was an invasion, pure and simple. The fact that people are still shooting at us should demonstrate this to you.
The UN Resolutions, while significant, do NOT authorize member nations to take military action without Security Council authorization, and Bush withdrew his motion when it became clear that it was going to lose not by some French veto, but 13-2 against.
Your argument about oil prices has no relevance whatsoever. We wouldn't invade to release vast amounts of oil at a low price when there is FAR more profit to be had by holding back. Have you sen oil company profits lately? Highest ever in history. The price of gold didn't come down when it was discovered in California. People went and risked their lives for it to make a fortune, not to lower the price of gold for their fellow citizens.
2007-06-18 05:23:58 · answer #3 · answered by oimwoomwio 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
The UN inspectors said that they didn't find any evidence of Saddam having WMD's. So, you guessed right it was all BS and well recognized.
When they say is about oil, they mean the trade of that oil is made in American dollars. That doesn't mean that the gas will go down in prices. Although, the trade being in American dollars benefits US greatly, illegally invading a country with BS for that purpose is an act of organized crime.
2007-06-18 05:01:31 · answer #4 · answered by Jose R 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It was an invasion, for God's sake!
Iraq had NOTHING to do with 9/11.
Iraq had no WMDs.
At Bush's first cabinet meeting in January 2001, an invasion of Iraq was discussed.
Bush pulled out the weapons inspectors so he could invade.
What Iraq did have was oil, and lots of it.
2007-06-18 04:49:34 · answer #5 · answered by wineboy 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
When one country attacks another country without provocation and with thousands of people and weaponry that is an invasion. The reason for the invasion may be to "free" someone or to take over something but it is an invasion nevertheless.
2007-06-18 05:31:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
*Not* calling it an invasion is media propaganda and right-wing brainwashing.
2007-06-18 12:12:28 · answer #7 · answered by clore333 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You already forgot 'Shock and Awe'? Conservatives tend to forget a lot lately.
2007-06-18 04:52:18 · answer #8 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
the Ministry Of Truth might have a vacancy for you-.George Orwell would be proud.
2007-06-18 04:54:19 · answer #9 · answered by celvin 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋