Including nutrition facts that make it the worst top 5.
2007-06-18 04:27:11 · 20 answers · asked by gamesalot9 3 in Dining Out ➔ Fast Food
McDonalds, Burger King, Arby's, KFC, Subway. The food is awful, the service terrible, the nutritional value almost non-existent. I eat at Wendy's only because they have the best salads (be very sparing with the dressings) & plain baked potatoes (I add Molly McButter). This is not to say that I don't indulge in McD's fries once a month but I avoid fast food as much as possible. I've been bringing my lunch to work for the past 2 months & putting $5 a day into an envelope. I now have almost $200 saved & will have almost $500 by the time I go to Vegas in Sept.
2007-06-19 04:16:21 · answer #1 · answered by bocamom62 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Taco Bell Chic-Fil-A Dairy Queen Burger King Subway
2016-05-18 15:02:59 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1. Long John Silver's
2. Captain D's
3. McDonalds
4. White Castle
5. Rally's
2007-06-18 06:18:08 · answer #3 · answered by JustPeachy !!! 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
KFC
Long John Silvers
Captain D
Hardees/Carl Jr's
Taco Bell
This is taste and nutrition!
2007-06-18 07:00:41 · answer #4 · answered by SAM 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Long Johns Silver - I am sure other places are horrible too for fat grams, etc but I remember with shock reading that LJS meal had something like 98 fat grams - for ONE meal !! I stopped eating there right away. If I go to any fast food places I will get a grilled chicken or roast beef, whatever. Something fairly health
2007-06-18 04:34:23 · answer #5 · answered by Sue A 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1. KFC
2. Taco Bell
3. McDonalds
They are the worst.
2007-06-18 04:55:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Taco Bell
Quizno's
Burger King
Hardees
KFC
2007-06-18 12:35:55 · answer #7 · answered by nobodyd 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
burger king (everything is fatting besides their side salad)
mc donalds(salads included are way over a good nutritional)
hardees(top worst)(nothing healthy at all)
sonic(offers no low cal, healthy choices but not too bad )
whatabugers( only offers big portioned meals )
2007-06-18 04:39:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
well if you are talking nutrition then probobaly mc donalds there loaded with salt like one time a cheeseburger was 500
sodiom grams,kfc they use to much butter,nations they give to big of portions,wendys they give to much greasy meat,and burger king because they also put a lot of salt
2007-06-18 04:50:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
We all know that McDonald's is not very good for you--but at least their food is somewhat edible. Taking into consideration the premise that fast food is not nutritional at all then there's a matter of taste.
SUBWAY is just flat out gross. You have to drown your sandwich in mayonnaise or that oil they have just to get some sort of taste out of it.
BURGER KING sucks because it's the only place where I have personally eaten and gotten sick. Just nasty.
2007-06-18 04:41:08 · answer #10 · answered by El Teke 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋