Daily, or weekly, and of substantive time. Maybe we would get more involved with our leaders again, instead of relying on, nationally recognized, but untrained, except in shock jock tactics meant to titillate the public, and, bring in more $'s.
2007-06-18 04:14:53 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Only if we insist on hooking those hooligans up to lie detector tests.. :)
2007-06-18 04:22:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You people don't listen to anything anyway. You lost the elections. You're lucky the dems don't act like the repubs do. Because if they did, you wouldn't even be invited to a town hall meeting. If it was up to me, you'd be in timeout for the next 8 years.
2016-05-18 14:11:51 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think talk radio should be outlawed. It's boring. All it does is provide a sounding board for the terminally angry who apparently don't have jobs but are somehow concerned with income taxes. They're listened to religiously by what Nixon referred to as the silent majority, and in prior times were more accurately referred to as the ignorant masses.
2007-06-18 04:25:40 · answer #3 · answered by webned 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No.
As highly trained broadcast specialist, Rush Limbaugh explains, being a talk radio host takes a number of skills and talents most of us just don't have...especially politicians.
It would be very boring.
2007-06-18 04:35:42 · answer #4 · answered by SallyJM 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No most of the people who go on these would be the extremes and I don't want to see the government paying for these waste of time things.
2007-06-18 10:26:41 · answer #5 · answered by ALASPADA 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nice premise in theory..but I think an accountibilty and complete public record of their activities would be a better
start..
Talk show would put them in re-election mode 24/7-365
2007-06-18 04:19:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It is a good idea but no one would actually listen to their programs. I for one know I would not want to listen to either of my senators (Specter and Casey) for more than 30 seconds.
2007-06-18 04:21:08 · answer #7 · answered by gerafalop 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
But wouldn't that interfere with them hob-nobbing with the wealthy and slow down their campaign contributions?
Horrors....
2007-06-18 05:57:37 · answer #8 · answered by Your Teeth or Mine? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's a great idea. We can't trust the media anymore.
2007-06-18 04:33:43 · answer #9 · answered by Granny Gruntz 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋