I just got this off of Hillary's website, sounds somewhat suspect to me...I agree Bush has been no fiscal conservative, more like a fiscal moron.
Hillary introduced a plan to Congress to create a Strategic Energy Fund that would inject $50 billion into research, development, and deployment of renewable energy, energy efficiency, clean coal technology, ethanol and other homegrown biofuels, and more.
We can create the fund without raising taxes by giving oil companies a choice: invest in renewable energy themselves or pay into the fund. She would also eliminate oil companies' tax breaks and make sure they pay their fair share for drilling on public lands.
2007-06-18 02:57:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Hillary s college thesis was based upon the writings of a Communist. Hillary has worked for Communists, both in her early law career and with the Chinese, prior to and after she was Sec ty of State. It is not what is obvious and visible that makes a person who they are, it is what they do in secret and behind the scenes. Hillary s actions are able to be researched and weaved together. She is absolutely a Socialist/Communist. Both she and Bill were once Republicans. She changed while at liberal feminist leaning Wellsley college, and helped turn Bil that direction, though he s not as bad. Politically, soicalism leads to communism and the two philosophies are of the same ilk (eg. Stalin, Hitler, Mussolini, Chavez, etc.) The evil of Socialism, is that it takes away the rights and value of the humanperson in favor of the State (aka Govt). All for the State, by the State, of the State - the exact opposition to For the People, by the people, of the people. This is why Americans should all be opposed to Hillary, Obama, and all those theare working with to fundamentally transform America into a Scialist/Communist State. Please research this yourselves. Your Universities are run by Socialists who indoctrinate students into what to think instead of how to think, Students graduate with only the so called knowlege the Socialists wat them to have and not actual truth or knowledge of anything. These students become robots of the state and think like they are trained to think - like Socialists - completely oblivious to the fact they ve been hoodwinked. That is why we see people like Obama voted in to office with a huge background in subversive behavior and anti-American work, with socialists and marxists alike. The truth is available out there for those who want to research this information, It is not fiction or some Conservative conspiracy like Hillary wants you to believe.
2015-07-05 13:01:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by D from VA 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
The socialist's main agenda is to CONTROL people's lives at the government level. Take away their freedoms and use the government to run folk's lives. Hillary Rodham Clinton has a LONG HISTORY of such shenanigans, dating back to her early days at Wellesley. One example, she does not think parents can raise their children well enough, they are not competent, so the government MUST legislate child rearing. If Hillary reaches the Oval Office she will continue her agenda to dominate the American people, and continue to erode our freedoms. Her history is there for all to research and to read. Investigate! Socialism - communism, study for yourself. Hillary and those like her lean so far left it is possible they might tip over someday.......that would solve a few problems in her 'big government' plans!
2007-06-18 03:29:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
all and sundry who calls Hillary Clinton a "socialist" or "communist" is the two thoroughly blind to the meaning of those words, or a liar, or the two. In different words, a Republican. I on occasion ask your self approximately rightwingers who're as much as now off the deep end that all and sundry, which consists of moderates and different rightwingers seem "socialist" by utilizing assessment.
2016-10-17 21:37:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Joseph Stalin: “Mankind is divided into rich and poor, into property owners and exploited; and to abstract oneself from this fundamental division ;and from the antagonism between poor and rich means abstracting oneself from fundamental facts.”
Nikita Khrushchev: “Comrades! We must abolish the cult of the individual decisively, once and for all.” (1956)
Hillary Clinton: “We must stop thinking of the individual and start thinking about what is best for society.” (1993)
2007-06-18 03:50:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by JOhn M 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
“The other day the oil companies reported the highest profits in the history of the world. I want to take those profits and I want to put them into a strategic energy fund that will begin to fund alternative smart energy alternatives and technologies that will begin to actually move us toward the direction of independence…” -Hillary Clinton
"I want to take those profits"
Case closed.
2007-06-18 03:17:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
hillary is not a socialist. like many people in this nation she supports some programs that from a socialist philosophy and some programs from a capitialist philosophy.
we have an openly mixed nation in terms of republic and democracy. we are not open about the fact that some things we have are from capitalism and some from socialism. many other nations have these same policies.
a smart government is willing to steal others good ideas and try to pruge the nation of bad policies and programs
2007-06-18 03:05:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
How can you not call her anything but? In fact, she tends to lean even further to the left than that. Calling her a socialist is actually kind.
Bush is a liberal, we know that and I find it hard to believe that anyone could disagree.
2007-06-18 03:10:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Federal spending doesn't indicate a socialist agenda. How that money is spent does. Anyone who doesn't realize that Hillary has a socialist vision for this country has their eyes closed.
2007-06-18 02:55:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by Brian 7
·
6⤊
3⤋
It is called redistribution of wealth. The opposite of capitalism. It is what Hilliary has said time and again. She wants us to have a "we are all in it together society, not I am in it for me society." She wants to raise taxes and destroy our healthcare system with socialized medicine. That sounds like a socialist to me.
2007-06-18 03:00:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by Georgia Bulldogs #1 2
·
5⤊
2⤋