English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I'd say Hillary, although Obama and his lack of experience isn't far behind.......

2007-06-18 02:06:54 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

20 answers

The Breck Girl: John Edwards. Hillary is a close second.

I'm still waiting for a Democratic male candidate.

2007-06-18 04:34:57 · answer #1 · answered by Matt 5 · 2 0

He is definately running he has stated that more than once and is already taking doantions to his campaign. Do I think he is a good candidate? NO!!!!!!! Will he win the democratic nomination? Only if he kills half his opponents and Iwould not put that past him. If he somehow wins the nomination will he win the general election? Hello President McCain or President Rice, or President Republican somebody. If the Democrats want to stand a chance Senators Biden, Clinton, and Kerry need to forget about running. Otherwise say to another 4 and possibly 8 years of Republicans in the white house. Those of you that want to vote according to what he says on television talk shows or radio talk shows for that matter are what is wrong with this country sit down and do your homework find out who he is as with almost every politician tose interviews are filled with lies. These people will say anything to get into office and then when they get in it will be business as usual. Why do you think John Kerry lost. He said what he thought people wanted to hear and that changed from day to day and all of his two faced lies were exposed as well as a lot of people did there homework and found out who he really is.

2016-05-18 10:45:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Hillary

2007-06-18 02:16:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

Well Kucinich disgusts me the most , but he doesn't have a chance anyway . Edwards -- same thing . So I'd have to go with Hillary .
She lies almost daily and her minions don't seem to care .

BTW , I do have 1 other choice.. . .. . Ron Paul . Although he's running as a Republican , he's no where near being so . He's truly a subversive fool that belongs in the Democratic Party with the rest of them.

2007-06-18 02:25:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5 2

None of the Democratic Presidential Candidates disgust me. It's the lying, greedy, all about taking money and health care benefits taking from the poor that's disgusting! And we all know which party that is don't we? THE REPUBLICAN PARTY! They're also the dumb @sses that allowed all of these foreigner to step on American soil too! But that's OK! Because chances go around! And it's about to be a huge misunderstanding Miss Thing!

2007-06-18 02:55:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

Disgust is a pretty strong word, but then again liberals are not nearly as hateful as conservatives, so I guess I just have trouble reaching your level. You were actually pretty rational there for a couple of weeks. too bad you have reverted back to troll form. I am only disgusted by child predators and wife beaters, not presidential candidates.

2007-06-18 02:11:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

Hillary Rodham - stand by your man - Clinton.

2007-06-18 04:14:37 · answer #7 · answered by mikey 6 · 4 0

Yep, we're all in agreement. Hillary Clinton is definitely the scariest. Although, if Demo-in-disguise Giuliani gets the Republican nomination, I'll have a tough choice ahead of me.

2007-06-18 02:10:41 · answer #8 · answered by skip742 6 · 4 3

Obama. Not only his lack of experience but, after all the lies he told in a speech he gave in Selma, I knew I did not want to see him in the White House.

2007-06-18 02:13:58 · answer #9 · answered by citizenjanecitizenjane2 4 · 5 1

I'd have to say Dennis Kucinich. I can't stand his over the top views. He was a complete failure as the mayor of Cleveland and would be unimaginally inept as a president.

2007-06-18 02:13:31 · answer #10 · answered by ? 5 · 6 2

fedest.com, questions and answers