Why not?
We already have Homo neuroticous, Homo sexualous, and Homo erectus (the latter is a descendant of H. sexualous, for obvious reasons).
I think the next stage will be Homo ontherangeous.
2007-06-21 21:05:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by SCOTT M 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
How very 'Waterworld'! It's a lovely theory but isn't too likely, unless the seas begin to drastically rise and being aquatic is an advantage. Modern life is pushing us further from physical prowess, instead making life so easy that no clear dominant physical characteristic is emerging.
I very interesting question though, have a star and I'll keep an eye on the answers, I'm intregued.
PS very nice pun ;-)
2007-06-17 22:29:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
it could prefer to if autism gave a reproductive earnings. the help in spite of the undeniable actuality that shows in any distinctive case. For it to be the subsequent "element" the alleles of the genes on the subject rely of autism could could prefer to augment contained interior the inhabitants genome. For this to ensue the autism alleles could could prefer to be exceeded directly to a extra advantageous share of the descendant inhabitants than the competing allele, subsequently the choose for further useful reproductive fulfillment. i've got have been given not any puzzling information yet i don't think of that it particularly is the case, in spite of the shown fact that the allele blend required to create autism, because of the fact it particularly isn't a single gene challenge, could be on the subject rely of a distinctive sensible replace and so be preserved, regardless of the reality that usually that is considered as deleterious. An social gathering of this consequence's sickle cellular anemia the area a single reproduction of the desirable allele ingredients resistance to malaria, yet 2 grant sickle cellular anemia.
2016-10-17 21:16:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by antonietti 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
We are already the water ape. Big paddle feet and the ability to swim and smooth hairless skin (by ape standards) to speed us though the water. We are able to free dive 60 feet for sponge, pearl and fish hunting. Sounds like we are already there.
The beach is actually a desert for life. No water life comes there. The ones that wash up are, uh....dead. No land life can tolerate the relentless tides. Not even grass grows there. Go to the beach and see the one creature that not only can live there but thrive there. Yes, it us. We are the swimming apes.
Fortunately, we are highly ornamental when properly attired for the beach.
2007-06-17 22:30:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by Owl Eye 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
we've evolved from the water so i dont know that we will be going back there
i feel we are evolving into homo universicus....
we have to adapt to living on other planets for resources and possible future living accomodation
already the US are planning to live on the moon to mine for helium 3
by 2017
2007-06-22 10:08:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by tim 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Humanatee becomes sequentially: a driver, a putter, and then putting the whole in one, a drinker. You could be right.
2007-06-17 22:33:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Been there, read the book, seen the video. Ever heard of Atlantis?
2007-06-18 01:22:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by cymry3jones 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Doubtful!! We have reached the highest level of evolution.
2007-06-17 22:33:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I doubt it - there are so many of that species who are not even acquainted with a shower.
2007-06-17 22:30:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by Dolores & the prune 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
do you think we will survive long enough to evolve further?
2007-06-21 02:03:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by john 3
·
0⤊
0⤋