English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Do you really want Socialized Health care?

Do you really feel she has the experience to run the country?

Do you really not already know she is also a NAFTA/NAU/SPP proponent?

Do you feel she is genuine?

2007-06-17 18:48:10 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

13 answers

The only candidate who has really impressed me is Mike Gravel, and number two is Ron Paul. Mike Gravel, from what I have seen of him, stands for everything that I believe is important for the quality of life for every person in this country...not just for the elite few! I wish more people were aware of him, and I wish that he would begin to get the support he deserves! *sm*

2007-06-17 20:37:22 · answer #1 · answered by LadyZania 7 · 0 1

Very concerned, the agenda is her own and we will not be able to stop her if she gets in office. I have keep up with her for years, and she is not good for this country with her "it takes a village" agenda.
Hillary's health care scam , she tried to pass while her husband was President. We could be fined between five thousands to ten thousands for not joining that plan, plus what the plan would do to all doctors is totally ludicrous.
She does NOT have the experience to run this country or anything else. She has just rode on the shirt tail of other politicians, big money corporations, the mob in Arkansas , InfoUSA and other big time money people. Her share the wealth is for everyone else, except her wealthy friends and the Clinton money.
Not only is she NAFTA/NAU/SPP, she also supports NAMBLA.
The word genuine is not correct, it is more like phony con artist.
This is one person that will never get my vote, no matter what party she claims to represent.

2007-06-18 02:11:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'm a radical for freedom, AKA a constitutionalist. I'd rather die than see Hillary in office, just like any of the founding fathers, and all the soldiers who died in the name of freedom.

Hillary is not a "Democrat" she is an out right socialist and elitist

"Do you really not already know she is also a NAFTA/NAU/SPP proponent?"

No dem, or lib, or socialist that isn't a radical against freedom has any idea what these things are! Let's spell them out shall we?

NAFTA= North American Trade Agreement. A program to end trade tarrifs in N.America to supposedly help poorer countries do more trade, but havening the opposite affect of helping fat-cat elitists get around labor laws of the US.

NAU= North American Union. An out-right attempt by elitists to copy the socialist EU, to dissolve the boarders of the USA all together. Elitist, you ask? Both dems and republicans are infested with them, aka builderburgers, aka world trade federation, aka committee on foreign relations and many others, basically those mega wealthy on both the left and right who think they are better than most people, and that most people are dumb and need to be protected from them selves, and that they are just the ones to do it.

SPP= Security and Prosperity Partnership. A very scary governmental organization made to start syncing the governments of Canada, Mexico and USA at all levels. Unapproved by the voters, and done in all but total secrecy it is actively working towards its ultimate goal of the NAU.

If you really want Socialized Health care, you merely need to move to Brittan, you can get all the welfair you want in Canada too. Why do libs pretend to care for freedom but try to force us here to conform to thier athiest/socialist religion?

2007-06-18 03:00:20 · answer #3 · answered by Larry M 2 · 1 0

I would love socialized health care, we need to focus on domestic problems before foreign.

Ofcourse she has experience, she was the first lady, she had a first hand account of presidency, and she is a senator, that's more experience than most candidates.

Yes I know she is a proponent of NAFTA and such, that is a good thing to me.

Genuine? No president is truly genuine, they are part of politics, and they are also human. So you'll never find a genuine candidate. I do think she is the most genuine candidate though.

2007-06-18 01:54:57 · answer #4 · answered by kperk_56 2 · 1 0

I'm not a Democrat but I am Liberal and I would never want this fraud to be president. She's owned by the corporations like most household name politicians.

"Do you really want Socialized Health care?"

I would like it, but I know that Hillary Clinton would not bring it...just like the other 30 something Democrats in the last 50 years who have promised it but never put out.

"Do you really feel she has the experience to run the country?"

She has the experience to run the country. But that doesn't mean that she'll run it well.

2007-06-18 01:56:44 · answer #5 · answered by LaissezFaire 6 · 0 0

I was not aware that anyone could convey as much nervousness in a simple online post as you do. Holy cow! You are going to be miserable when Hillary is elected. I will not kick you while you are down, though. I, too, have had to live my life under a President who I am not fond of for the past 6 1/2 years. Big difference will be that the country will resemble the United States that was envisioned by our forefathers. I can't wait.

2007-06-18 02:23:40 · answer #6 · answered by Speedracer 3 · 1 0

I think most of health care proposals are controversial one way or another. She does have fair amount of experience although many point out her poor performance as legislator. She does have good grasp on Iraq issue. She has served on arms committee. I think she could probably out debate others on Iraq, security. But she still didn't read that NEI before Iraq war vote. Like most of law makers and most candidates. She's about genuine as other candidates in the race.

2007-06-18 02:44:31 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

ummmm i think she has more experience running the country, than any of the Republican candidates, after all, she was First Lady of the USA for 8 years, and First lady of Arkansas for several.

She is more genuine than the flip-floppers that are running as Republican candidates

socialized health care, might make it safe to eat out again.

2007-06-18 01:54:19 · answer #8 · answered by avail_skillz 7 · 1 0

we are a nation in need of better healthcare.
hilly could do the job. i do believe that.
the future is globalization.

is she genuine? she's a genuine politician, that's for sure. trustworthy? she voted for the war. later she rails against it at the same time signing away more money for the war.

2007-06-18 02:04:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I am NOT a Democrat, thank goodness, but I think Hillary will ruin this country. If she couldn't satisfy her husband how she going to be satisfy anyone else? How will she get the mexicans to stay in mexico and the terrorists to stop killing us and love God or the French to respect themselves and the lazy poor people to get jobs?

2007-06-18 02:45:53 · answer #10 · answered by Sister Aimee 2 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers