thermite was only planted in some buildings and not others.
2007-06-17 17:48:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
6⤋
Wrong! There were LOTS of buildings close to Towers 1 & 2 that fell besides WTC 7!
2007-06-21 02:52:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by ddey65 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wtc 7 fell because there were many important offices and files that had to be destroyed . Rudy gulianis office was in there as was CIA, FBI all the insider trades reports from the put options on the planes made days prior to the attacks. They were very small fires fire did not bring down that building a 2 yr old could see that. It was brought down by explosives as told by Larry silverstein the owner and freshly upgraded insurance policy that would pay out billions for its terrorist destruction. He said he talked to the fire dept and told them to just pull it. That is a term used by demo crews when they are ready to set off their explosives to bring a building down however it does take weeks to setup a building for demo thousands of feet of wire and carefully placed explosives in pin point locations need to happen. Oh and I suppose they did it all in a matter of hours right when all the chaos was going down they had time to call a demolition crew and have them work under conditions like that when no one even knew if there would be more attacks. We would setup a demo of a highly official bldg.? during the attacks of 9/11. Ok that sounds plausable. If you have doubts go back to sleep and wait for the governement to tell you wake up.
2007-06-17 17:57:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by stephenmwells 5
·
4⤊
2⤋
WTC 6 was in between 7 and the north tower. It was 6 stories tall, was heavily damaged, and had fires but didn't have a 30 story tower on top of the fires that it needed to support.
WTC 7 was a 47 story building... a lot of weight to support by a failing steel structure...
Implosion theorists don't understand the amount of advance work the companies that implode buildings do. They work on the structure for a month or more before the shot, weakening the structure so that it falls properly.
2007-06-17 17:48:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Holden 5
·
4⤊
3⤋
I, too, have been wondering about all the details which seem to have been left out of the news stories... and, additional comments, thereafter. I am saddened that our media has had to back off, for the most part, in doing their journalistic, investigative reporting. Watch Keith Olbermann on MSNBC's "Countdown with Keith Olbermann", he has made some pretty bold statements, and I applaud him for doing so. Not all of which I may agree with, but, nonetheless - very bold!
2007-06-17 18:39:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ro40rd 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
many of the people answering this question are sick conspiracy theorists that are basically spitting on the graves of those slain on 9/11.
it was not our govt, it was sick psycho terrorists that killed all those people.
and yes, the iraq war was the right idea. --- even clinton and gore made claims that saddam had wmd's and was training terrorists to kill americans.
it is our duty to kill as many terrorists as we can --- harsh, but realistic!
2007-06-21 15:50:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ted M 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Mole men. Don't leave out the mole men.
Try doing a search on wtc7. the number of questions on this topic is staggering.
2007-06-17 18:10:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by jake T 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
That is because WTC 7 was mined and the buildings in between weren't. Did you really need to ask?
2007-06-17 17:39:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by LaissezFaire 6
·
3⤊
5⤋
I told you to watch the movie. It's all in there.
2007-06-17 17:38:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
W planned it that way. Like all psychotics they play a game with their victims like leaving certain clues behind to find them. Keep pounding that out I know someday you'll prove w did it.
2007-06-17 17:36:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by thetimbosley 3
·
3⤊
5⤋