should you first move with your children establish residency in a different state while just separated or "taking time off" and then file for a divorce where the spouse staying behind can no longer fight for the children to stay in the same county?
2007-06-17 15:04:38 · 9 answers · asked by yahoo?? 1 in Family & Relationships ➔ Marriage & Divorce
yes if you havent filed yet there is nothing against the law taking your child
2007-06-17 15:06:50 · answer #1 · answered by rpoker 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How totally selfish of you. The spouse has rights to see the children too. The children should be able to visit the other parent. You should stay close to the other person for that purpose. Why do you think you are the only one who has the rights to the children?
2007-06-17 15:47:58 · answer #2 · answered by Sweet Suzy 777! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If there is no threat of dangering the children then get the agreement with your ex to be about moving out of state, so you have a signed agreement that he knows you are moving the children. this way he cannot get you on kidnapping charges. If you are divorcing make the divorce as clean as possible and in the best interest of the children and not out of anger or to get even.
2007-06-17 15:15:34 · answer #3 · answered by cheoli 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You would have to be gone for at least six month for the residency requirements to take affect.
Why don't you just make a false allegation of child sexual abuse, or domestic violence, like most women would do?
No clear and substantial proof is required and there are plenty of women's groups as well as shelters who are completely willing to help.
With a false allegation of domestic violence, you can move anywhere you want and you can prevent the children from seeing their father, even if they wanted to.
It's also easy to coach them in making a sexual abuse allegation. The minds of children are very malleable. UCLA did a study showing how just repeated questioning children about it will generate memories that something happened. They did it by having a doctor do a simple external physical examine of 300 children, then for eight weeks they were questioned on what he did. At the end of the time period, 100% of them had elabrate stories of sexual abuse.
2007-06-17 15:16:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yet there is no laws against it there are no laws that your spouse can't come and take them back. Without a divorce your just asking for trouble.....
2007-06-17 15:12:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You should do the right thing....and the right thing is to separate, stay in state, and deal with the issue in a fair and above board kind of way.
karma bites. Dont tempt it.
2007-06-17 15:11:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Maybe you could, but should you? If your spouse is plays a positive role in your children's lives, it would be unfair to them to move them. Your children should come first in all of your decisions.
2007-06-17 15:10:39 · answer #7 · answered by schweetums 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
That be a sleazy thing to do, and the courts would recognize it. Don't let yourself think that there is ANY judge who will overlook that.
And they would likely make you move right back.
2007-06-17 15:09:38 · answer #8 · answered by Magaroni 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Only a slimy, vindictive witch would do such a thing.
2007-06-17 15:20:14 · answer #9 · answered by LilyBelle 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋