hard to say i mean they're comepletly un-related..but since i'm 15 i would say coach shoes...idk vera bradley just reminds me of old people (no offense)
2007-06-17 12:06:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The shoes
Always the shoes.
Because shoes are so much better than an icky backpack
Cheap for Coach, too
The last Coach shoes I got were $200
Got any pictures?
2007-06-17 19:06:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by needlepoint_lace 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hmmm. I,personally, wouldn't spend $88 on a backpack or shoes, but if I had to decide between the 2 I'd get the shoes.
2007-06-17 19:07:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by DJ 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Definitely go for the shoes. Vera Bradley crap is ugly and overpriced.
2007-06-17 19:10:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by hottiecj *~♥~*~♥~* 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Vera Bradley's stuff are alright, better than Coach
2007-06-17 19:29:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
i would say the coach shoes are more worth it because shoes stay in season longer than backpacks
2007-06-17 19:07:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Neither. there are people who could eat for a week with 80 bucks... but if you have the money the backpack is better since there;s a chance it'll last longer than shoes.
2007-06-17 19:07:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by Schan 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
how bout u add the 88 dollars and 84 then add another 200 bucks n buy a hot looking coach purse
2007-06-17 19:18:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by A G 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Coach (they last longer
2007-06-17 19:10:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by Lana C 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
overpriced.
I would never pay that much for shoes or a backpack
2007-06-17 19:10:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋