Why do people think that we judge Clinton 'as a person'?

Question

Seriously-why do people think that lying under oath is a "personal matter to be judged by God"?
Seems to me that is just a detrimental and undermining to our country as anything else I can think of.
After all, it makes him a liar, right? Are one persons lies excusable and not another persons?
Isn't that called hypocrisy?

Answer 1

Perhaps it is easier when u feel betrayed to except when you find reasons for unreasonable behavior. He betrayed US as a nation. So if you blame the fact is just was/was not sex and if so he is entitled to it? and so what? you provide excuses. Apologies for getting caught?
The deception began as a man, a vow of monogamy?
The Lawyer, protect the laws as written.
The Governor, dealings with police and numerous holdings and money questions??
The President, sworn in on yet another Bible to uphold the office, defend the US and protect, extra etcetera.

The person became a political figure long ago accepting these requirements and swearing the truth. He up held none of them. That is why to me the individual long ago chose his path and deception was a part of it. As Mr. President there are no excuses for lieing to a Grand Jury. None whats so ever. His wife may forgive his mistresses but a nation can not afford a leader who can not uphold his pants let alone values.
The world is too volatile for another round of personal agenda administrations. No hypocrisy. Facts out weigh any excuse u can come up with to put this man back in the White House.

AMERICAN's sent to protect and died for US
http://www.nysun.com/article/48926
4,417 killed in peacetime on Clinton's watch
but who's counting?

Answer 2

Ok, Let's get something instantly. Impeachment is NOT REMOVAL. Impeachment is Bringing the cost. It is like an Indictment in a crook case. President Clinton WAS IMPEACHED. It was once now not "Attempted" The vote was once now not enough for removing. And why?> We could have simply gotten Algor. It takes a Two Thirds majority to take away. He WAS located responsible of mendacity beneath oath, however sanctioned, now not eliminated. Among the sanctions was once a 5 12 months revocation of his license to train regulation. IF "historical past" Tells the tale every other method, It has been revised. So that brings me to my different factor, and that's the best way "historical past" tells the tale will generally rely on who writes the historical past. I am discovering now that the best way History is portraying Ronald Reagan isn't in any respect adore it was once. I was once an Adult for the period of Reagan's Presidency, and a member of the staff, and Believe me, they didn't name it "the last decade of conspicuous intake" for Nothing. TRULY, Everyone who WANTED a task had one. At this level, 3 and a little bit years in to his first time period, we had been including 450,000 jobs a month, now not this pathetic one hundred twenty five,000 that we're NOW being informed is a "restoration" But now, from what I see on right here, the revisionist historical past academics are so within the tank to advertise socialism, that they have got totally twisted the tale.

Answer 3

lying under oath (perjury) is a crime so it something that our government takes the authority to Judge. Just like murder or assault.

Answer 4

All people in politics get judged. Clinton is just another one of them.

Answer 5

Neither one is right. But Clinton didn't send our Americans to foreign soil to get killed .....for what?????