over-rated?
2007-06-17 09:59:50 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
I admired her for many reasons. Her "innocence" was real.
Bless the poor girls heart, she actually loved that weasel Charles. Until he went public and shamed her. I can't imagine a life like "that". She made the most with what she had been given. Well done, I thought!
Yet after reading her "real" manuscripts from the national "Diana" tour of artifacts and seeing the items up close. The "Hollywood" aire was totally gone.
She was a lovely brood mare. If you read her OWN families account of her life, it was like they were raising a "blood line" brood mare, to be sold to the highest bidder. As was her own mother! I think her family is "milking" every penny out of this poor dead woman. I am ashamed to say, I gave them some of mine. I wanted to "See" for my self the truth.
The entire thing, was done to "Show" the real person. Her grades in school were poor and that didn't shock me much. I did research on her handwriting and it confirmed my thoughts on her "emotional state". Her "own" sense of style was terrible, the "Diana" we know was created by someone else. She actually preferred the causual "frompy" look of a house mom.
She was terribly insecure and aenorexic, suffered from bouts of depression. On top of being told "horrible" things about her own family. That is so sad.
I do however believe without a doubt, the best thing she ever did was have children, That was the love of your life. It is truely sad, she never got to see her children become men and be a grandmother.
Yet, it was apparent from the beginning, you shoot the "mare" when the colts are born. To keep the line clean. That is my opinion, and I have no doubt in my mind, that her death was NO accident. More so today, then at the time of it.
I can see why most folks would feel she is over rated. Her sons what to keep her alive in the world, since she is "their" face of international love and acceptance as royality.
That was a modern day tragedy...and the story continues.
2007-06-17 12:03:06 · answer #1 · answered by Denise W 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think she was a sweet kid caught up in a situation beyond her capabilities.
She lacked the personality to be a Princess of Wales. Living in the fishbowl of public live made her sick.
Charles should never have married her, she was entirely unsuited. He should have married a member of another royal house. Then his princess would have known how to handle the paprazzi, and public scrutiny. And she'd probably never expected Charles not to take a mistress or three and would have taken a discrete lover or two herself.
All in all, I think Diana was more hype than substance. Poor kid.
Doc
2007-06-17 17:38:34 · answer #2 · answered by Doc Hudson 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No she was a very nice Princess I mean look at the other Queens&Princesses they have their nose stuck up in the air,but Lady D had her feet down to earth.And by the way celebrites tend to have their lives under the spot light and it was not her fault.
2007-06-17 17:17:16 · answer #3 · answered by Just me 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Everyone in the public eye..every celebrity....well they ALL are over-rated.....that is just my opinion....think about it....if it were not for us they would not have careers in music, movies...etc etc...
2007-06-17 17:04:13 · answer #4 · answered by Kimmie 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, I liked her. She did alot for the common folk....
2007-06-17 17:15:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no..she was a lovely princess..
2007-06-17 17:05:17 · answer #6 · answered by latina_girl 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
She may have been bi-polar. She seemed to have different personalities.
2007-06-17 17:03:30 · answer #7 · answered by notyou311 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Oh no cotton! She was cute!
2007-06-17 17:03:26 · answer #8 · answered by Kitten Hood 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I think she was very Do-able
2007-06-17 17:02:48 · answer #9 · answered by Phillies 2008 WS Champions! 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋