Each particle gains mass continuously. So all the protons and neutrons and electrons are more massive, in the rest frame of someone travelling at high speed relative to the object. In the rest frame of the object itself, nothing changes at all!
2007-06-17 06:35:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by cosmo 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
E = mc^2 and the relativistic mass gain are not directly related like that. Just moving at near the speed of light does not change energy to mass, for the moving observer.
When energy is converted into mass, the most elementary particles are created: electrons, protons, neutrons, and their anti-particles (also lots of muons, neutrinos, tau leptons, etc). If the particles and anti-particles are kept apart by strong electro-magnetic fields, then they will form hydrogen (and anti-hydrogen). A trace amount of helium would also be formed. Heavier elements would be extremely rare.
2007-06-17 06:52:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by morningfoxnorth 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Gosh, some human beings won't be able to help being over-complicated. The capability dating between mass and speed is basic. If I positioned a a million Kg weight on your foot, it won't harm. If I drop it from 2m, that is going to harm quite. If I drop it from 200m it may weigh down your foot. So, of course the capability in a physique could contain its mass and speed. Then very in simple terms, as you up the speed, the capability is going up with the aid of the sq. - an actual baseball pitcher basically thows approximately 5 circumstances speedier than a newborn, yet his ball will hit you with 25 circumstances the strain. E=mc^2 is in simple terms an extension of the kinetic capability formulation e=mv^2 which you learn in intense college physics. the version is that interior the nuclear formulation you're pondering a finished conversion of mass to capability, the place the top result's electro-magnetic radiation vacationing at gentle speed. bear in mind that gentle-speed is definitely the incorrect term, as gentle is in simple terms a small fraction of the electromagetic spectrum, which incorporates radio waves all the way as much as x-rays.
2016-11-25 03:17:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by segerman 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Very intuitive question. Atomic structure has been studied to quite a few details. Atoms Nuclei have been split by collision and mass radiated as the result forming Gamma ,alpha and beta radiation including heat radiation.
However no one Understand how E=mc^2 is locked into the mass with particles moving at the velocity of light inside the Atom. You can have explanations galore but no real understanding of what is energy (see Dr. Feynman about Energy definition)
Big Bang theory as well as Relatiivty theory Never offered an explanation what caused the atoms to form the Structure that is outlined in the Periodic Table of element.
2007-06-17 06:47:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by goring 6
·
1⤊
3⤋
If your space ship accelerates to 1/2 c, its mass and the mass of each of its atoms (not counting used up fuel) will increase by a factor of sqrt(4/3) from the viewpoint of a stationary observer; it will still be made of the same elements. From your own point of view, the ship's mass (not counting used up fuel) will still be the same.
2007-06-17 06:37:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There has never been anybody in more dire need of taking a course in Special Relativity than you ☺
Energy is 'not' changed to mass by approaching the speed of light. The 'apparent' (or, as we like to say, 'relativistic') mass is only observable to someone not in the moving objects inertial reference frame.
Doug
2007-06-17 06:53:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by doug_donaghue 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
The element that would be created is the lightest element, i am not sure what element that is tho
2007-06-17 07:06:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋