In 'The Sunday Times" she is said to be considering giving up her part time GP position to become the person to represent child welfare and protection against peodophiles.
Now, I for one find this offensive.
I always lock up my home when I leave it so my valuables are safe.
I would not want someone to represent house security who always left their doors unlocked. I would not trust their opinion.
How is she fit to do take on this job? She neglected her children, or has she forgotten that already. How can she advise or be in the position to help anyone?
2) How can these two people almost make a celebration out of the 50th day their daughter has gone missing. Why are they preparing for things, like large concerts with Elton John? These things will take a while to organise. Do they not expect Madeline to be found for some time then?
2007-06-17 06:08:18 · 12 answers · asked by Roisen C 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
That makes a mockery of things. Then again, how can she resume her previous career? As a doctor there are bound to be times when she refers patients to social services if she suspects all is not well. It's going to be difficult for her to do that in the future and I can't see parents feeling too pleased about taking child care suggestions from her if she did ever resume a medicinal career again.
2007-06-17 06:27:19 · answer #1 · answered by Eden* 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
im sorry ive never got into this mccann thing but if this is true its not right im sorry we soon forget about those other poor kiddies out there that have lost there lives this is now getting out of hand dont y think....
2007-06-17 14:17:51 · answer #2 · answered by Tilly 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
She is perhaps the least qualified person for this role. All this activity is a professionally-guided public relations campaign, I am certain.
2007-06-17 13:16:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
How dare she even think about that. She is a neglectful parent, she doesn't care about her own children's welfare, never mind anyone else's.
2007-06-17 15:12:05 · answer #4 · answered by dreaming_angel1983 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
It's all about ego boosting for the McCanns now
2007-06-17 13:11:23 · answer #5 · answered by Weatherman 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
you know id say great if it were sara payne, but kate mccann, thats hilarious, i wouldnt trust her with my gold fish! its a farce, i wonder if any childrens charities, like the nspcc, support her decision!?
2007-06-17 14:18:47 · answer #6 · answered by bluebella 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
well lets just say if she told me i had a daugher,three dogs and four cats i wouldnt believe her funny that considering that i do have all of the above
2007-06-17 17:18:17 · answer #7 · answered by arniesmum 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
That would be a travesty these people certaintly are low life.
2007-06-17 22:34:02 · answer #8 · answered by peppersham 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
They are skewed parents, truly.
2007-06-17 13:11:00 · answer #9 · answered by StayThirstyMyFriends 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
It is one big mockery
2007-06-17 13:39:52 · answer #10 · answered by CT 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋