and i thought they where not in Iraq.
2007-06-17 06:07:13 · 22 answers · asked by Jeremy P 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
im talking about in iraq when you say we attacked what do you do when we where attacked you defend your self we cant seem to do that when we get attack because you think we deserve it.
2007-06-17 07:48:23 · update #1
They weren't in Iraq until we got there and they Iraqi's wouldn't be dying if we hadn't gone invaded. The right has to start facing the reality of the situation and stop kissing Bush's a$$.
2007-06-17 06:28:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 1⤋
why do you lump every liberal and progressive minded person in with people who choose to lay blame on george bush for orchestrating the 9-11-01 attacks?
i hate to tell you this, but not every liberal believes this idea. as a matter of fact, i would say the vast majority do not believe this concept. most so-called liberals/progressives believe that foreign terrorists formed a cabal and setup and carried out a symbolistic attack on the united states that day. what they believe we should do after the attacks may differ from our own thoughts of strategy. .
what's the matter? are you having a bad day or life so you chose to smear liberals for no good reason other than to spew some venom which has built up within you?
the sad thing is, you attack a bunch of fringe believers yourself, yet in the end, it seems you have become a fringe denizen yourself by conjuring up far-fetched notions that all libs are one in the same.
well it's been fun expounding a bit here on Whacky Question Of The Day. take care, and don't let your venom buid up too much. remember, you can self-inflicit the poison into yourself and those who think like yourself.
2007-06-17 13:27:01 · answer #2 · answered by peapatchisland 2 · 5⤊ 2⤋
They weren't in Iraq until we foolishly invaded and handed them an excuse on a silver platter. 100,000+ dead Iraquis would argure the point with you, by the way.
The US invasion of Iraq will go down in history as one of the gravest and most idiotic strategic blunders in the history of mankind. Given who was at the helm, I'm hardly surprised.
Before you think that I'm some bleeding-heart liberal, my opinion is based upon 21+ years of honorable military service to this nation.
2007-06-17 13:22:31 · answer #3 · answered by Bostonian In MO 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Bush's policy has not only killed Iraq citizens but also American soldiers in a futile war.
Al Qaeda didn't arrive in Iraq until after our invasion as we secured the oil refineries but not the borders!!!!!!
and of course Al Qaeda is in Iraq. they are lining up by the thousands to kill American soldiers like a hunting expedition!!!!!! all in the name of freedom.... such a paradox isn't it???
2007-06-17 13:23:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Al Quaeda was a faction created by the CIA in the early 70's and Osama Bin Laden was tapped to lead the ficticious group. Guess who has had ties with the CIA since to 60's and guess who's family has had shady business dealings with Osama, Hussien, the Nazi War Machine and other countries who's leaders support torturing and terrorizing their own people?
Yep that's right! As that 'ol saying goes,"Behind every Bush there is a terrorist!" You should proably try and brush up on your history kid.
2007-06-17 13:24:01 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Grammar and Spelling 101 class:
Why do hateful libs believe G. Bush killed all those people when you hear Al Qaeda taking the credit ?
geez.
2007-06-17 13:18:23 · answer #6 · answered by psatm 3 · 4⤊ 2⤋
It looks like you were mistaken when you thought Al Qaeda was not in Iraq. They came there after we invaded and so they are there now and their number increases as long as we remain. I don't know about hateful libs, I suppose there are a few, certainly less than hateful cons, but anyway I don't think anyone but you seems to think G.W.B. killed those folks that Al Qaeda is taking credit for.
2007-06-17 13:16:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 3⤋
Which people are you talking about.. the 9/11 killings or the 13,000 innocent Iraqi that have died along with over three thousand Americans.
Which ones do you think Bush is responsible for?
2007-06-17 13:17:22 · answer #8 · answered by Debra H 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Al Qaeda is an acceptable ally and Jorge is not.
Edit: I have to agree with Hasan.
Sorry bro. I know what you meant but was tempted to correct, but passed on the temptation. Were you tempting us skippy?
2007-06-17 13:25:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because Bush lied to start this war and sent our troops there to invade a country that never attacked us. That is a disgrace to America--and the blood of those who have died is on his hands--he and his followers. The guild is theirs--and none of their excuses or "spin" will wipe away the stain.
2007-06-17 13:19:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 1⤋