or is it better to try and find a job first the get a home :)
2007-06-17 04:51:38 · 3 answers · asked by dodge 1 in Business & Finance ➔ Renting & Real Estate
What a loaded question.
Yes, it is better to move into a rented house with no job and limited money...if the other option is on the street with no job and limited money. But, I doubt that you will find anyone that will rent a house to you without a job...unless you have enough cash.
2007-06-17 06:03:21 · answer #1 · answered by Russ B 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
With no job and limited money, good luck finding a landlord willing to take a risk on you. I certainly would not!
Get yourself on a sound financial footing before even thinking about striking out on your own. Most financial planners recommend that you have at least 6 months worth of ordinary expenses in liquid funds to consider yourself financially sound. If you don't even have a job yet, you have a long way to go before you can realistically think of moving out on your own.
2007-06-17 12:05:36 · answer #2 · answered by Bostonian In MO 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Stay at home until you get a job, then decide from there.
If you have never lived on your own, a house may not be the way to go immediately.
2007-06-17 12:00:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋