China is (has been) America at capitalism, while America is beating China at corporatism. Y/N?

Question

The USA is 1 trillion in debt with the CPC.
But China doesn't have one major corporation Forbes' 'top 100' corps. The US gov't is war profiteering...while China is developing their economy at an unprecemndented rate, employing hundreds of millions through US corps, has risen 400 million out of poverty since 1980 (largely thanks to the downsizing/outsourcing of American co's to Asia)
Those are my thoughts. What are yours.
Intelligent responses only please.
xie xie.

SORRY, SHOULD READ:
China is (has been) beating America at capitalism, while America is beating China re: corporatism.
It's a thesis.
Do you agree?
Yes or no.

I'm 28 and have lived on four continents by myself. I have an MA in Asian Studies, speak Chinese, and live in Beijing. Cute Tiananmen ref. can't you come up woth anything else?
Go shoot up a high school.

I live in China...and have for four years...in 13 provinces. now 2 years in beijing. americans are absoultely clueless. i'm canadian btw. i've also lived in the us, australia and england...
the chinese government/media is not nearly in your face as much as the American media/propaganda/sensationalist machine.
come here.
i double dog dare any american here to get off your fat *** and see what other people in the world think of you...and what other people live like.
disgusting.
you should be ashamed.

my call sign shows that i'm bi-cultural and can see things through a global paradigm and historical perspective.
Go torture some poor people in Asia..

matt...
china's pop'ln is just over 1.3 billion.
do your research, or go answer paris hilton questions. india's pop'ln will overtake china in the next 25 years...why?
because the 1 child policy is a responsible action on the part of the CPC.
**** your prop articles on abortion, whatever...
come to china, talk to the people.
i'll translate.
go lynch a black man, or wipe or wipe out the native population.

hksmartboy,
explain more and you've got yourself the points...a poet at heart.

Answer 1

All of you are wrong in one big area.

China has only had a few decades of a free market system to go from being a dud economically to world class. In fact, for years China subsisted on economic zones and only in the last few years has China included all of their country as one huge free market system.

Percentage wise, as far as income disparity, China and the USA are about even. With China and the USA both have 1.8% of the people who make up the bottom 10% of income and consumerism while the USA has a lower percentage who make up the top 10%, 30.5% vs 33.1%.

What one poster pointed out that China has more living in poverty, that is misleading when China and the USA have roughly the same percentage living in poverty, about 10% and China has over 3 times the number of people. Of course they are going to have more living in poverty.

------------

There are more China answers found through my profile. I live in China, an ex pat living there for the last year.

Peace

.

Answer 2

Well do you know China has a large slave population and the government turns a blind eye to that. China has a lower payroll that the states through cheep & slave labor and so does India. Capitalism is the worst system that was ever developed, because its false empty and leaves millions behind. China is a Communist country so there system has been working along now with Capitalism in there hand the few will make a killing while leading the mass in doomnation

Answer 3

So move there then.

-- And get run over by a tank.

No I don't agree. America might have her problems but no one, repeat, no one, beats her at free enterprise. In China you don't own anything. The government owns you.

If you get pregnant with a second child they force you against your will to get an abortion no matter what month you are in. They abort fully formed viable babies.

Their economy for a Communist government is not bad but only because they are themselves experimenting with capitalism. If you can call slave labor capitalism. The standard of living there is abdominal while ours is the envy of the world. Our poor live better than their middle class.

They are still very much a backwards nation. One that is very dangerous to their own people and the rest of the world.

Answer 4

No. this is ridiculous. China has over a million.3 billion human beings, and as those days as 2004, one 6th of them lived on decrease than $a million.25 according to day! That menas that just about 3 hundred million chinese language human beings - just about the finished inhabitants of the U.S. - stay interior the main desperate poverty, no longer able to have the money for any of the main uncomplicated needs of existence. China's according to capita GDP is approximately $7,4 hundred. interior the U. S. this is $40 seven,000. the common American makes extra suitable than 6 circumstances as plenty funds as a results of fact the common chinese language individual! And as a manner to realize even that modest point of prosperity, China's government has had to motel to a pair draconian measures to maintain its remote places funds artificially low. this is via no ability soemthing a capitalist society might do. no longer basically that, yet China's cutting-edge industrialization has led to some undesirable environmental effects. China's cities are crammed with smog and different pollutants, they have denuded great swaths of the rustic to mine fossil fuels, and that they are wreaking considerable havoc on their rivers with dams and pollutants. u.s., in contrast, is a quite healthful united states of america from an environmental attitude. No. China isn't beating the united states via any stretch of the mind's eye. China has made considerable strides in cutting-edge times, yet they nevertheless have some considerable financial issues. EDIT: you could no longer learn what's seen "poverty" interior the united states to poverty in places like China or the 0.33 international. An American living on the poverty point remains infinitely extra suitable off than a individual living in severe poverty (defined via the UN as a results of fact the $a million.25 according to day benchmark). Poverty interior the united states ability which you won't be in a position to have the money for a effective vehicle or which you may desire to keep at WalMart for deals. severe poverty lets you no longer have the money for nutrients, safeguard, clothing, or something this is needed for uncomplicated existence.

Answer 5

It's a difference in philosophy. The Chinese are baking pies as fast as they can. In America, the rich people are using the laws to make sure that the rich people get all of the pies that are baked and to punish any bakers who sneak bites.

Answer 6

America's doing better at capitalism too. Its GDP is much higher than China's. China's growth rate is higher, but it won't stay that high. It's easier for small things to grow at a fast rate than for big things to grow at a fast rate. That's why the stocks of small companies usually increase more than big companies. But those small companies usually don't eventually outgrow the big companies. And a 1 trillion dollar debt for the US is not that big compared to its GDP.

Answer 7

The library of congress is littered with junk (no pun intended) thesis.
China is poisoning it's own while telling them they have superior genes that make them impervious.
China is keeping it's lower classes poor, while trying to attract ex pats back.
China see's the corporate structure imposed upon it by multinational corporations as a temporary condition. It tries to float trial balloons, as a measure of it's timing.
I hope you find these constructive. For further reading check with the CFR .

Answer 8

No. China is good at producing a lot of low quality, low priced goods. That is why it is flooding world markets. On the other hand, the US is making high quality, high priced goods, thus the presence of large corporations.

Answer 9

Your call sign shows your bias and any real rational on china's way of ruling their people would just be a waste of time.

Answer 10

its academic. liberal tax and spend and failed welfare schemes of extremists like the pelosi/reid regime will destroy the business base anyway so what possible difference could it make right or wrong whatever the answer is.