just a thought that we have NO good choices for MOST elections. if there is a way to halt elections until GOOD/DESIRED politicians run, its a well kept secret. I think everyone WOULD vote if there was a good choice and not one between 2 evils. (brewsters millions)
2007-06-16 23:44:50 · 4 answers · asked by ihavepeaceofmind 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
If you don't like the main two candidates, you can vote for a third party candidate. If they aren't on the ballot, then you can write in their name. You can vote for yourself, if you want.
2007-06-17 04:16:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Those who say we should "vote them out of office" are only saying "vote for the opponent". The closest we currently can come to a no-confidence or none of the above is to do a write-in vote for Mickey Mouse. Our (US) elections would be much better if we could rank-order the candidates on a ballot, instead of just voting for one. For example, if there are 10 candidates, the voter would indicate which candidate s/he prefers the most (and that candidate gets 10 points from that voter's ballot) second most preferred (9 points) all the way down to least preferred (Supreme Court selected).
2007-06-19 01:06:33 · answer #2 · answered by G S 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope, if everyone voted "none of the above" except one person, whoever received that one vote would be the winner.
2007-06-17 08:02:47 · answer #3 · answered by Monk 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I HAVE MY CHOICE , AND SHE IS NOT EVIL.
2007-06-17 07:09:41 · answer #4 · answered by 10-T3 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋