2007-06-16 22:55:25 · 6 answers · asked by ™ ♥♥♥ 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Of course. But the people wouldn't support that law, since it's an overreaction.
2007-06-17 04:23:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, because negative reinforcement doesn't work (two wrongs don't make a right). But if the reward for not doing it were to have sex with you, I think we would see a drastic decline in the poaching of helpless endangered animals. Of course, then you would be helplessly endangered.
2007-06-17 05:58:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A few bouncing Betty's might!
Either that or set up a guard tower and laysome line to a few claymores. They would love to eat ball bearings! Takes out everything for a 100 meters!
2007-06-17 06:02:00 · answer #3 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, death penalty does exist for people committing crimes and this does not stop them, actually it make them more prone to fire the barrel.
2007-06-17 06:05:57 · answer #4 · answered by Oyibo 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That what they get for being helpless and endangered....the death penalty!!!!!
2007-06-17 05:58:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
sadly, no.
2007-06-17 06:04:14 · answer #6 · answered by tori Lynn 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋