I think they should have stopped being "Colts" when they moved from Baltimore. I have no idea what Indian is famous for.
The Indianapolis Letterman.
2007-06-17 02:24:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that they should keep them as they are. The Colts uniforms are an NFL icon.
I do know, however, from a book that I read, that this current team is a second formation of the Colts. The original Baltimore Colts franchise went out of business sometime in the mid-1950s. And they were replaced, one or two years later, by an NFL franchise that had failed to draw much interest in Dallas, TX.
The original, failed Colts wore a uniform with the horseshoe, but the uniform was either red or green, it seems (I can't remember for sure). Blue and white were the colors of the Dallas franchise who when they moved to Baltimore kept their own team colors, but adopted the horseshoe logo.
I used to think that it would have been neat if, when the Colts moved to Indianapolis, they would have adopted another team logo and team name, leaving the Colts for the city of Baltimore. But now the Ravens are established there, and I don't see any reason to change anything really.
2007-06-17 03:15:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by billyrayhombre09 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The colors and logo are great but I would like to see an alternate uniform for sure.
Perhaps a blue helmet with a silver horseshoe outlined in white would look great but I'm not advocating a helmet change as much as a jersey/pants change.
The Broncos did a decent job although I loved the old style.
2007-06-16 22:46:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Awesome Bill 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, of course, they should change their uniforms!
Can you imagine the stench of the locker room with 53 guys all wearing the same moldy uniforms for almost six months? ;)
As for the uniform design I think it is the best in the league and not just because I'm a Colt fan. I like the simple elegance of the design.
Oh, and an extra bonus! It pisses off Baltimore fans who still whine about the fact that they failed to support the team and forced it to move! :)
2007-06-17 00:18:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I hate uniform changes. But hey, it's the NFL. They do that stuff. Sells tickets and whatnot. I prefer college football where the fans don't whine about penny-anny crap like that. I'll take tradition over glitz any day.
2007-06-16 23:57:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by gregpasq 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I do cuz their more dull than lookin at a pair of flat boobs. THERES NOTHIN THERE. Just solid white and blue numbers with maybe a blue stripe and a gay lookin horse shoe. They should definately upgrade, along with the Steelers, Cowboys, and 49ers. I know you go by the old stuff but do what the jets did, they have their old Namath age emblem but they re did it. This is the year 07 not 57
2007-06-16 22:49:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I like them. It's like a piece of history. Kind of like the Dallas Cowboys/Cheerleaders. The colors are what make the Colts recognizable.
2007-06-16 22:30:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by chevy_muscle_fan 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually, they replaced the Dallas franchise, they didn't start there. ANd the Dallas franchise was moved from New York.
I say the Ravens and Colts switch uniforms.
2007-06-17 01:12:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by BAGOFSWAGS 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Why change it , fine uniform.
You do know that the colts started out in Dallas late and middle 1950s
2007-06-17 00:31:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by Michael M 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
yeah, but what would you change it to? it fits them very well, but i'd like to see a change if it was a good one, definitely keep the colors though, if they have to change, just changed the shade of blue slightly, but i think the colors are fine
2007-06-16 23:08:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by panther2188us 3
·
0⤊
0⤋