2007-06-16 21:45:04 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
The U>N> sorry to say, has lost everything through the years. In Kosovo they were sending out patrols without ammunition in there rifles so there would be no incidents. The U.S. had to be called to to straighten the situation out.
The U.N. in Africa is nothing more then a sideshow and face powder, there's nothing behind it and, these warlords and gang leaders know that.
The U.S. has gone in every time to bail them out.
2007-06-16 22:36:35 · answer #1 · answered by cowboydoc 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The UN doesn't take over because it does not want to. Like many other people and nations, the UN has been against the "war" since the beginning. Why would they step in now even if the US asked them to?!
2007-06-17 05:18:24 · answer #2 · answered by jtwb568@yahoo.com 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The UN is basically a forum where countries can work together and everything the UN does is funded and staffed by individual member states. It doesn't have the right to walk in and take over any country it pleases. Nor does it have the money to run an operation like that. And no one outside the current colaition wants to send their soldiers to Iraq.
2007-06-17 04:58:49 · answer #3 · answered by brownieleslie 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The U.N. is far from being the one you would wont to call in a crises. They are not capable of handling their own problems. Corruption all the way to the top.They were involved with the oil for food for the Nation of Africa.
Saddam and the U.N. conspired and made his self and others in the U.N. much richer. In other words they took the barley and the wheat that was bound to Africa to feed the hungry and played games with it, to line their own pockets with greed!
2007-06-17 06:48:36 · answer #4 · answered by NJ 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
after all the crap the usa went through to get control of that oil there're not going to turn it over to the un. the un tried to stop the war in the beginning to support the german, french, and russian oil companies that were waiting for the sanctions to be driopped so they could start pumping that cheap abundant iraqi oil. the usa has lost a lot of people and money to break those contracts and keep that oil off the market for exxon and the saudis they can't just give it back. if that oil hit the market we might be paying $1.00/gal for gas. exxon and s arabia we feel so betrayed by g bush they'd probably kill him.
2007-06-17 04:53:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
americans invaded agaisnt un advice, so the un wants america to take its medicines
2007-06-17 04:52:23 · answer #6 · answered by harlan.martin0724 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
What, precisely, would the UN do in Iraq?
2007-06-17 04:49:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋