is not right to land a fundamental right? if not why ?

Answer 1

The Constitution (Forty-Forth Amendment) Act, 1978 omitted the Right to Property as was provided under Article 19 (f) & 31 of the constitution. It was stated in the Statement of Objects and Reasons appended to the Constitution
(Forty-fifth Amendment) Bill, 1978 (Bill No. 88 of 1978) which was
Enacted as THE CONSTITUTION (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978 In view of the special position sought to be given to fundamental
Rights, the right to property, which has been the occasion for more
Than one amendment of the Constitution, would cease to be a
Fundamental right and become only a legal right. Necessary amendments
For this purpose are being made to article 19 and article 31 is being
Deleted. It would, however, be ensured that the removal of property
From the list of fundamental rights would not affect the right of
Minorities to establish and administer educational institutions of
Their choice.
Now there exists only legal right to the property which was once Constitutional Right.

Answer 2

It is not right to land a fundamental right because in this corrupt world people around you want to make you low ,sad loser and then want to make fun of you . So, never give them such an oppurtunity. Idid not mean your wellwishers

Answer 3

No. Land is already owned by other people, and in order to give you a "right" to it, they'd have to take it away from the people who currently own it, and that wouldn't be fair to them. They paid for it.

Answer 4

yes i agree with u.