Cavaliers got shut out. What happened??!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-06-16 09:23:43 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Basketball
What happen? The East is too weak to compete. Anyone watching all season long should have seen that the West was going to smoke the finals whether it was San Antonio or anyone else.
2007-06-16 09:52:52 · answer #1 · answered by Ray 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i'm an all time miami heat fan, so i really didn't care who won.
but i was really upset and frustrated with the cavs. no disrespect, but the only reason why cavs went to the finals is b/c the 2006 nba champions miami heat were always getting injured! of course even though new jersey got the amazing vince carter, richard jefferson, and j.kidd alongside mickey moore, everyone knew they were not going to the finals.
the only reason cavs made it to the finals is because lebron james took control in the eastern con. finals against detroit, and daniel gibson took over in game 6. they don't have a lot of great players. lebron's new baby is a blessing, but it might have tired him out.
also, the NBA finals had a record low ratings.
click here to see:
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_ylt=Ag9crDS9zDpbsY7orLwYlEO8vLYF?slug=ap-nbaratings&prov=ap&type=lgns
2007-06-16 10:43:18 · answer #2 · answered by secret151990 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
are you saying JUST dissapointed?!!
The sopranos finale got more viewers than the finals, and you saw how bad that was. Probably one of the lowest rated finals to date. When spurs won in game 4, it looked like they were just celebrating a playoffs berth, not a championship ring.
When you look at it, if the spurs loose in the first round, the ratiings will recieve a huge boost. It's like they've travelled in the future and know whats to come.
(all my teams went down :( raptors, nuggets, GST )
2007-06-16 10:29:05 · answer #3 · answered by chetty_29 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i was really dissapointed about the finals cuz the cavaliers seemed like they didnt even have a chance to start up what they did against the pistons
2007-06-16 09:27:08 · answer #4 · answered by yo-ran 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
spurs were destined to win...they're just a better team...and the whole expectation of them were pretty high...so yeah seeing as how people already predicted and planned who were going to be victorious...it pretty much sucked the fun out of the finals and the sport...
so all in all...if cavs were to have won...a lot of more hype and attention would've been garnished in the media as well as credential of LBJ...
2007-06-20 07:35:25 · answer #5 · answered by Enigma 7 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
haha. I in no way appeared at it like that. it is so unhappy how far they fell. can we be saying this approximately a number of this 3 hundred and sixty 5 days's meant "draft gemstones"? BQ: specific, Courntey Lee could have made a minimum of one in each and every of "The Shot(s)"
2016-10-17 11:55:22 · answer #6 · answered by finkle 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I was disappointed that theCavs weren't able to play better but I was thrilled to see the Spurs bring home another trophy.
2007-06-16 10:20:09 · answer #7 · answered by Alice K 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
actually didnt see it because the fix was in for san antonio so why waste my time? the spurs are a good team but is hard to beat when the refs and commisioner are behind u so makles it impossible to win
2007-06-16 09:27:54 · answer #8 · answered by apremont1 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
i was happy! spurs rock. =)
2007-06-16 09:30:41 · answer #9 · answered by Amanda 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋