Democrats on Friday defended the extra money in the homeland security bill, noting it contains money to hire 3,000 additional border agents, improve explosive detection at airports and provides money to double the amount of cargo screened on passenger aircraft.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070616/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush
2007-06-16
06:42:42
·
7 answers
·
asked by
avail_skillz
7
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
people who claim democrats are weak on security threatening to veto security measures....hmmmm
2007-06-16
06:49:24 ·
update #1
and if you read farther in the article, it shows bBush stating how Americans don't want to go back to the times when our government actually paid its bills!?
2007-06-16
06:50:49 ·
update #2
= ^_^ =, you need to do more research.
Republicans trimmed Clinton's airline security measures, prior to 9/11, because airline lobby said it was too expensive. guess it was cheaper and covered on insurance if a few planes slammed into a couple buildings.
2007-06-16
06:59:08 ·
update #3
pigvomit, your name is appropriate considering your statements.
please do your homework!
2007-06-16
07:01:18 ·
update #4
Miss Kitty, you don't know how to read very well do you?
doesn't say anything about this particular bill being threatened with a veto because of earmarks.
2007-06-16
07:15:15 ·
update #5
From the Government Here To Help, did you even read your own link??
or do you think parents shouldn't be able to decide if their minor children are exposed to ...rape, dismemberment, physical torture, mutilation or evisceration of a human being???
2007-06-16
07:29:30 ·
update #6