Time will show.. Military strikes? I hope not.. I'm not even sure the US can afford stirring up more trouble than they allready have in the middle east.. So unless they decide to make imperialism popular again... And I don't know how smart that would be.. I hope that the US get's off it's high horse, swallows their pride and try to solve their fears in a diplomatic way...
2007-06-16 12:08:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Everybody's pissed off that America is using military force in Iraq, so I don't think the USA will get any support if they choose to fight in Iran. So if the Liberals take over in '08 then they'll use diplomacy, but I don't know how far that'll take them.
2007-06-17 17:06:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by andy c 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think the current admin ain't the diplomatic kind and would love to use military strikes on Iran but for the Afghanistan/Iraq debacle.
I loathe hypocrisy, Iran may or may not be developing aggressive nuclear capability but can understand if they feel the need to when they're so threatened by belligerent, Western nations that feel they have the divine right to be so.
2007-06-16 12:59:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
on condition that one and all diplomatic potential have been exhausted and Iran have been to aim a preemptive strike on the two US or Israeli forces. If Iran assaults Israel, Israel will retaliate and the U. S. will furnish information. i don't think of militia action in Iran is possibly. i don't have faith the yank human beings elect to make sure the worldwide conflict on Terror open a clean front, until the fronts in Iraq an Afghanistan have been closed. fairly some the opinion polls instruct the yank human beings elect to deliver domicile the troops in Iraq as quickly as available, so i don't think of coming into Iran could be extensively prevalent. even with the undeniable fact that, if Iran have been to influence an attack, it somewhat is very not likely, sentiment could substitute in choose of retaliation.
2016-12-08 10:53:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No diplomacy will help to tame Iran.It is one of rogue States fostering terrorism.Only USA can prevent making of Islamic bomb by Iran.USA may not get directly involved in Iran.it may be through Israel .By the time US decide some action ,Iran might have develped the bomb,they are doing all out efforts in this direction.
2007-06-19 22:48:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by leowin1948 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
It is doubtful that America will openly engage Iran. That said, if diplomacy doesn't stop Iran's nuclear program, watch out for the Israeli's to take military action. Its their existence at stake, not America's.
2007-06-16 04:49:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Diplomacy first, innit! If that don't work, strikes military may follow.
2007-06-16 20:54:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by Dragoner 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think they will use military strikes onnit rather than innit.
I think our governments U.S.A and U.K are completely out of control in the UK at the beginning of this war in Iraq we had 90% of the people against it in the polls. Massive demonstrations all over London and the rest of Europe. but it still went ahead they say they are trying to give the Iraqies a democracy. Why dont they give us one first.
Why shouldn't they have nuclear weapons Americas got them Englands got them. I think they probably feel quite threatend by the coallition and fell that they need them. Personally I feel more threatend by my own government than the Iranian one even if they did have nuclear weapons. We are being governed by war criminals. Also why do people keep asking for for public inquires they dont get to the truth just more cover ups.
2007-06-17 20:18:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Its kind of difficult to engage in diplomacy crazed dictators who call for the destruction of Israel and of the United States.
Unfortunately ,there is no alternative.If USA doesnt deal with the Iranian threat ,Israel arent poisoned by the loony left and will certainly neutralise Iranian nuclear weapon production.
We have to bear in mind that Palestinian terrorism and insurgency in Iraq is funded equipped and motivated by Iran.
A groundforce invasion will spell the end of world Islamic terror.
2007-06-16 23:09:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by private 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
i guess they don't have any other option,otherwise Iran will create a damn Islamic empire and then all around the world must be converted to bloody Islam.
they want to export the Islamic revolution to all nonislamic countries and America is the last chance to stop this sh** happening,as an Iranian i have to tell you that Islamic regime in Iran is an Arabic dictatorship and has nothing to do with Persians .
Persians are trying to destroy ARAB CULTURE AND ISLAM IN IRAN AND THEY WILL.WE HATE ISLAM,THAT'S 100% TRUTH.
we don't like Islam and nobody knows better than a Persian that what is this religion and how dangerous and devilish is.diplomacy is not working when your enemy have a sword in his hand,we hope America be fast enough and we will help them to get rid of those stupid Arabic Islamic governors.we don't need nuclear energy we need freedom and democracy.
one more thing my freind ,GOD BLESS AMERICA AND AMERICAN AND GOD BLESS BUSH.WE LOVE THEM.
2007-06-16 05:14:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by arya 2
·
0⤊
2⤋