if...ian chappal's....................."UNDER ARM DELIVERY" WAS BOWLED BY SRI-LANKA, INDIA,or PAKISTAN
Bowler...what would have happened?
what would be the response of australian & british Media?
2007-06-16 04:38:34 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Cricket
sorry ....Trevor chappal's Under Arm Delivery by Asian bowler?
2007-06-16 04:40:03 · update #1
The rules are different for whites and us.If they do it is called as tatics or error but if we do it is more than a crime and the Asian circketer who had done will be black listed and they make sure he never plays circket because the BCCI,PCB,SLCB, and all governing bodies of subcontinent obey ICC and take orders from them.
2007-06-16 21:34:01 · answer #1 · answered by SRK'S KNIGHT RIDERS 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
First of all the under arm delivery by Australia against New Zeland in the last ball of the innings was most disgraceful in the history of cricket and I am surprised why Umpires allowed the same.
I am sure if any other country resorted to such a tactic, there would have been lot of hue and cry not only in cricketing circle, but in the media as well.
2007-06-16 05:01:43 · answer #2 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The under arm delivery was not one of our finer moments in cricket,and we were condemned for it by the media back when it happened,we still get criticised for it to this day,so i don't think an Asian team would have received any different treatment,the under arm was legal at the time it happened and the laws were changed straight after that-what more should the ICC do? remember it was way back in the 70's.
hey nakalaf maybe we should take bets on which sri lankan fan you'll give the 10 points ha ha.
2007-06-16 21:05:16 · answer #3 · answered by FORKY 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First of all the under arm delivery by Australia against New Zeland in the last ball of the innings was most disgraceful in the history of cricket and I am surprised why Umpires allowed the same.
I am sure if any other country resorted to such a tactic, there would have been lot of hue and cry not only in cricketing circle, but in the media as well.
2007-06-16 05:34:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well even within Australia almost all sectors of media, public etc universally condemned the discision to bowl underarm, but it was perfectly legal within the rules at the time. I think the nationality wouldn't have mattered. No one really approved, and they wouldn't have done if it was an asian bowler either. It was unsporting, and not really within the spirit of the game, even if it was legal. Even Trevor Chappell didn't really want to do it, but didn't really have much choice.
That was proved by the fact the ICC changed the law immediately to prevent it happening again.
2007-06-16 04:59:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
It was unsporting, and not really within the spirit of the game,
if it was an Asian bowler ,..icc & australian media would have done serious damage to that particular country's cricket.
Mcc would have said that is not spirit of cricket.
icc might have banned "the asian cricketer" to life.
they are very serious when asians doing any wrong thing,
not Australians.
dont you agree?
2007-06-16 06:08:32 · answer #6 · answered by ♥SMARNY♥ 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
2pt
2007-06-21 04:08:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋