No he is a buffoon that is bud not Jason.
This guy has no clue what the American public thinks.
He was happy with the tied all star game.
No credibility with this used car salesman.
2007-06-16 06:45:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Michael M 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't believe that Selig is justified. No. Jason Giambi's biggest problem is the fact that he speaks sometimes without thinking things through. He's kind of a sincere person, just speaks honestly about how he's thinking and feeling. He doesn't strike me as the most intelligent man, but he does seem to be honest. That honesty has opened a world of trouble for him.
Jason Giambi never lied when it mattered...to the grand jury. That was sealed testimony that would have never come out. Honestly, it never should have.
A lot of people have lied about their steroid use. They say it never happened. They are still playing and still breaking records. Bonds comes to mind.
It seems unfair to me that in Giambi's wish to apologize about "stuff" that he can't come right out and say, that Bud Selig is now considering taking baseball away from him.
Giambi is clean now and he proved he can play clean. How do you suspend someone from baseball because of something he said that people thinks means something else? Really?
Giambi never confessed to the public to using steriods, nor did he confess to Bud Selig.
If Selig goes through with this then he needs to hunt down all the people who the rumors have flown about, suspend them, and charge them. But all of them.
When they had the congressional committee on baseball, Giambi was excused because of the grand jury testimony. Look at how many people sat and lied to congress that day. Raphael Palmiermo shook his finger at a congressman and said he never did steroids EVER. Look how that turned out.
If they go after Giambi they need to go after all the other players out there that we know, or think we know were dirty. Giambi shouldn't be punished for his honesty in sealed Grand Jury testimony, or for the fact that he tried to apologize when he should have stayed quiet.
2007-06-16 05:04:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by Kevin H 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
I think the rule is the player gets suspended 50 games if he fails a drug test. If Giambi doesn't fail one, then I don't think it's fair to suspend him and not guys like Barry Bonds and Sammy Sosa.
At least Giambi came clean, I think that's what Selig and co. are really mad about. They wanted him to keep lying to cover their asses about steroid use in baseball. Now that he's blowing the whistle on them. they want to throw him under the bus to take the heat off themselves.
2007-06-16 04:48:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by wise_guy_81 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
Obviously Bud -Man doesn't watch cop shows on TV If he did he would know that granting Giambi immunity from prosecution in return for testimony given, will benefit MLB more than suspending him will.
2007-06-16 06:22:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Giambi has admitted to nothing specific in public. Read his quotes. To think otherwise is filling in the blanks for him, which means he's playing you like the fiddle you are, and he's winning the PR game.
2007-06-16 04:48:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Chipmaker Authentic 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
initially i believe that Giambi mad a valiant attempt to earnings a number of his dignity lower back whilst he admitted he did incorrect, yet he might desire to easily say i'm sorry for taking steroids, quite of pertaining to it as "that stuff." That way he'd be completely coming sparkling. And u.s. is particularly forgiving for errors. He might desire to guy as much as his very own indiscretions and cooperate. Bud Selig isn't fooling around in this, and it will basically harm Giambi extra interior the long-term if he does not. He nevertheless has yet to stay as much as that extensive settlement he signed some years lower back, yet helping out with the study will placed lower back in stable graces with the widely used public slightly. however the secret's this entire project is plenty extra suitable than Giambi. he's in simple terms certainly one of various professional athletes that have "cheated" via employing overall performance-improving ingredients, and it is not his activity to blow the whistle on anybody else. Or he ought to basically choose to forget approximately approximately this and face the end results of suspension. The ball's in his court docket, and this is as much as him if he needs to swing for the fences or strike out lower back.
2016-10-09 08:08:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by mcgahan 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
GIVE ME A HELL NO ON THAT ONE. BUD SELIG IS A JERK. WHEN GIAMBI DID STEROIDS & HUMAN GROWTH HORMONES THERE WAS NO POLICY IN BASEBALL
TO COVER THIS. NOW BECAUSE OF SOME DUMB COMMENTS MADE IN AN INTERVIEW WITH USA TODAY
SELIG WANTS GIAMBI TO TESTIFY IN FRONT OF A COMMISSION RUN BY EX-SENATOR GEORGE MITCHELL. MITCHELL IS A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE BOSTON RED SOX WHO RECENTLY APPEARED ON FIELD IN A RED SOX JACKET WHILE HIS GRANDCHILD WANTED TO GET AUTOGRAPHS PRIOR TO A YANKEE-REDSOX GAME ON ESPN. CAN WE SAY CONFLICT OF INTREST KIDDIES?
2007-06-16 05:38:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i thinkt that he is justified but i dont thinkt hat he should. jason jaimbi is one of the players who came out and admitted that he took steriods unlike palmero who first said he never took them then said he never knowingly took them then said tehada gave them to me. i think that barry bonds should be the one to get in trouble because he has obviously used steriods. if you ca=ompare what he looked like when he started his career to what he looks like now you can tell. he has bulked up a gross amount and there is no way that it is natural. baseball should do and actual random drug test and not tell the players a month a head of time so they know its coming. if baseball did that then they would catch the poeple who deserve to be caught doing the steriods and not poeple who at least had the decency to admit that they had done them like giambi
2007-06-16 04:45:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by mj 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
Yes he is justified, the guy admitted to doing wrong, and right now it's against the rules so definately.
2007-06-16 06:05:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
No. I think Selig is a moron.
2007-06-16 05:38:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by inquisitive1 3
·
1⤊
0⤋