English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

11 answers

The truth is nobody wants to answer the question,because then they would have to look harder at the twin towers coming down.

2007-06-16 03:29:04 · answer #1 · answered by lalalalaconnectthedots 5 · 1 2

I have no respect for the "pick the ONE sentence that supports your view and ignore everything else" mode of arguing.

I wish there were an automatic way to track people who do it.

Folks, read the REST of what the lead investigator says (Dr. S. Shyam Sunder) said about the investigation. I'll be interested in what conspiracy theorists suddenly and unreasoningly jump on this and how many repeat it "as PROOF!" of their nutcase ideas (vs. a genuine and thoughtful approach to the issue).

Rumor and innuendo is not a thoughtful approach, nor is ignoring the official reports just "because they were done by the government that always lies".

What a convenient way to ignore everything the other side says. Accuse them of lying and say that no matter what they say.

2007-06-16 03:45:52 · answer #2 · answered by mckenziecalhoun 7 · 0 3

If WTC7 collapsed because of fire....then why didn't WTC5 collapse? -that building had much worse fires that dwarfed building 7's fires, it WAS a ''raging inferno,'' -google to see pictures of fires in building 5. If building 7 collapsed because of damage from debris, then why didn't WTC6, 5, 4 or the Bankers Trust building collapse? again, these buildings damage was MUCH worse than the damage sustained by building 7. The smaller trade buildings were bombarded with debris, they also had smaller steel columns than building 7, but they didn't collapse. The Bankers Trust building had a 24 story gash torn through it when a 100+ ton steel fragment from the South Tower slammed in to it, but it didn't collapse.

2007-06-16 03:30:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

don't you love how people have jumped down your throat about having a conspiracy theory when all you are doing is asking a simple question.. shallow people.. I would like to know the truth. you can either use your brain and think and see for your self or you can conform to what you are told. everyone needs to question and test everything before they take it on and believe it as truth. if you don't you are gullible. good luck and well done for questioning

2007-06-16 04:37:50 · answer #4 · answered by tuff*titty 4 · 1 1

The building collapsed.

2007-06-16 03:36:15 · answer #5 · answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6 · 0 1

http://www.azstarnet.com/public/packages/okc_verdict/
You have to wonder why a building would collapse when engineers build them to stay up .
Demolitions is the only way to bring them down in most cases .
Hell just look at the Iraq Lebanon and other war photos of buildings and decide if you want to believe Bush's story or your own eye's

2007-06-16 03:28:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

Dude... Terrorists attacked our country on 9/11. That's the truth.

You are a media jihadist. Stop reporting my answers.

2007-06-16 03:38:19 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

The truth is, the building collapsed. :)

2007-06-16 03:22:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 5

'TRUTH' means nothing to conspiracy loons. Even when presented with the truth, they will continue to rail against it.

Vince

2007-06-16 03:22:59 · answer #9 · answered by vinny_says_relax 7 · 1 5

maybe he is just another goof with his own conspiracy theory too.

2007-06-16 03:32:27 · answer #10 · answered by doctdon 7 · 0 4

fedest.com, questions and answers