"History doesn't really repeat itself, but it has a nasty habit of rhyming." - Mark Twain
An example:
In the final centuries of the Roman Empire, the Emperors outsourced defence by hiring some of their German neighbors to fight their wars with them and for them. Some of these Germans later used what they had learned about warfare to follow their own interests, including attacking the Romans at times. This lead to the fall of the Empire in the west.
In the 1980's, the US govt outsourced part of the cold war by training some Arabs in terrorism tactics to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan. Some of those Arabs, such as bin Laden, later used what they had learned about warfare to follow their own interests, including attacking the US on 9/11. Sound familiar?
Now we are outsourcing the search for bin Laden to the gove of Pakistan, which is much more interested in its own preservation than in capturing bin Laden.
Will we never learn?
2007-06-16 04:26:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by sudonym x 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
History never repeats itself. There may be similarities in circumstances, but never a blind copy of historical events.
Why did Hilter try to invade Russia with the onset of winter?
He must have read about Napoleon's demise there, and yet he repeated the same error of logistics.
Whether a person is a scholar or not, he or she will always be doing something similar to what someone else has done.
And that is what has made civilization last. Without continuity, you cannot build a culture. A constantly changing series of events would be chaos.
2007-06-16 03:01:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by henry d 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would say that those that haven't learnt anything from past mistakes will always go on to repeat them again. Quite scary how ignorant people are of some of the most important and pivotal points in the history of their country, let alone the world and the long running implications that those moments caused right up until this day
2007-06-16 02:41:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by lisa m 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Disagree...you equate analyzing background with coming to the incorrect end. maximum of what you component out is dogma and is a consequence of ingrained suggestions and suggestions. Had the persons you listed above studied ALL of background, this is available/probable that a distinctive end could have been reached. Had Hitler studied Napolean's loss at Waterloo, he might have found out which you do no longer attack Russia during the wintry climate. Bush's vendetta against Hussein isn't a private "historic" vendetta, it develop right into a calculated attack according to a learn of the background of Hussein (torture, oppression, etc.) coupled with a private actual time vendetta - additionally noted as revenge. Revenge is often own and has no longer something to do with analyzing background. via analyzing background (fall of empires, circulate of things, the interactions of cultures) guy can extra suitable be sure the thank you to handle subject concerns with others, boost be attentive to-how, and sidestep the errors of the previous.
2016-10-09 08:02:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by gilbreth 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
"History doesn't repeat itself, but historians do" -- Unknown
Studying History is a wonderful thing but most of the worlds great mistakes have been made by educated people that should known better. Besides, there are things in History that I would enjoy repeating.
2007-06-16 05:59:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by Menehune 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Those of us who have studied history notice that certain actions are repeated over and over again, by different groups or individuals at different times, with the same, or similar results.
A very good example of this is that Hitler made the same mistakes Napoleon made. Both were successful while they allowed their generals to lead the battles, and while they followed advice from experienced individuals.
When Napoleon wanted to invade Russia, several of his top advisers warned him against it, because Russia was so large and the winter weather was so appalling. Napoleon ignored them and consequently countless thousands of soldiers and failed in his conquest.
Hitler's armies suffered the same fate when they attacked the USSR, and his losses against the Allies in the latter part of WW2 were primarily the result of his insistence on managing battles from his head-quarters in Berlin instead of allowing commanders on the scene to make appropriate decisions.
2007-06-16 05:58:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by marguerite L 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It happens all the time, problem is people don't even realize it. We do it all the time, except people now call it experience. For example if you do something, and it fails do you repeat it the same, or do you change it a bit?
Remember history is anything from yesterday to thousands of years ago.
2007-06-16 02:42:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by rz1971 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
That is true.
"Notable Quotations from George Santayana
'Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.'
This saying appears in many different forms, but the earliest version is probably that of the poet and philosopher George Santayana.
2007-06-16 02:42:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Simply put, there is not much different from you from people from historic times. The requirement you need to live everyday was the same rules they needed to live every day.
In summation, you need food, shelter, and social network. People who try to diverge from this mix of needs will live a very difficult life.
This is what we call history.
2007-06-16 15:47:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by atg28 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
no, i never studied for any tests in US History, including the regents, and i did very well in the clas & got a 98 on the regents, however, i did pay attention in class....
2007-06-16 02:43:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by love ya 2
·
1⤊
0⤋