Ever since 9/11, Bush has used his "war against terror" as an excuse to allow the government to snoop into private citizens phone calls, bank records and who knows what. Why would they not snoop into Yahoo??
2007-06-15 23:26:42 · 23 answers · asked by Haywood Jablomee 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I'm sure they do.
That's why I answer by typing with each middle finger. ;)
2007-06-16 01:28:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I doubt this is a serious question, but ill answer.
1. Big Brother' is a term from a book about a goverment completely unlike this one.
2.snooping requires time and effort and resources. There is nothing private or confidential on yahoo answers so technically it would be completely legal for anyone to 'snoop' here. However there is no chance at all that the federal government would profit in any way so i guaruntee, nobody is 'snooping'.
The snooping done by the federal government was not, i assure you regular joes of the nation. That woudl be silly. It would mor elikely be people with sensitive information or who have some direct or indirect links to suspicious organizations. Take, for example, A recent immigrant from Iraq who happens to be a molecular biologist and begins working for the CDC and makes 3 or 4 emails to the same person in Iraq every day. I could see that getting snopped on. And so what? Why not? so some guy might wind up reading this guy chatting with his cousin. big deal. What if it really was something to worry about? then it IS a big deal, right?
2007-06-16 01:08:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
oh yeah, they probably are reading everything. I wouldn't doubt it as they watch everything we do anyway. This is Democracy LOL.
Oh well, I say what I want and I really could care less if Big Brother likes it or not. Anyway, if they've read a lot of my answers on here they'll be knocking on my door any day.
I don't care and I'm NOT afraid
2007-06-16 01:43:06 · answer #3 · answered by Chery 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
maximum have basically study the areas that have been stated to them via their religious leaders and the areas that have been the subject of learn in communities that they participted in. there are various areas that are prevented via those religious leaders and via the learn communities, as a results of fact the questions they boost may be too no longer elementary to respond to. those that study great chunks of the bible on their very own are uncommon, and those human beings have an exceedingly distinctive attitude on the finished element. this is magnificent how plenty stuff there is in there approximately intercourse and homicide and racism and torture and slavery and vicious sensless death on the hand of god and childrens being punished for their parents or maybe their distant ancestors crimes... It 's those areas that maximum folk will in no way study as a results of fact their ministers will in no way deliver them up. they do no longer decide to might desire to describe it and lose contributors of the congregation whilst they comprehend how little experience all of it makes.
2016-10-09 07:56:40 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm sure someone "screens" this place and mnay others.
I am not to worrried about them reading it either. This is a public forum for eveyone to see my answer.
Umm THE FAT MAS WALKS ALONE.. I SAY AGAIN THE FAT MAN WALKS ALONE.
Not like we are using something so public to pass secert codes or anything.
SEEK THE MAN WITH ONE RED SHOE!!
(lol I love old forgotten movie quotes from spy guy movies)
2007-06-16 01:26:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes they probably do, I believe that having to read for hours the amount of stupidity that is generated is a good enough punishment
2007-06-16 00:40:41 · answer #6 · answered by joelle G 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You have way over exaggerated this, and of course, blame Bush. Got news for you, this was long before Bushie ever took office.
2007-06-16 00:34:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
If they don't abuse it! they can use it. Not problem with overseeing things. But I don't believe they are worthy nor wise. So it means.... vote...... and a "no vote of confidence" should be in the count. They never tell you how many people didn't vote, do they?
2007-06-15 23:34:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
If BB is watching then they might learn something useful for a change.
2007-06-15 23:29:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yahoo is doing that job they delete ans they don't like Watch this "I think Libs are brainless" see ya
2007-06-16 01:24:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
and do you do anything that would be considered a crime?
as a country we don't have enough people to watch our borders but we are supposed to have enough people to watch every board, blog and website on the planet?
First off you would need to do something that would garner their attention, then you would have to be doing something illegal then you would have to be caught in the act of doing thing illegal thing.
So unless you are actively participating in a crime your worrying about nothing.
And the left accuses the right of fear mongering... pshh...
2007-06-16 00:12:31 · answer #11 · answered by Stone K 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋