When people have sex outside of marriage it has the potential to create children that may grow up knowing neither their mother nor father. This damages their moral growth and may be connected to why many persons lack essential common since. Even with protection the emotional scars abused sex, or sex with a fair whether counter part, leaves are devastating. I believe any person who can't wait until they’re married should have all their eggs in a bank, have their sperm in a bank before having a hysterectomy, or have the government cheaply remove their reproductive organs and replace them with simple urethras. I believe this will give many problems (I can't list or else I'd run out of space) we face near permanent solutions. What are your comments to this concept? If this idea has any flaws then correct them.
2007-06-15 21:40:57 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
And I bet you would like nationalized health care too...PLZZZ..when has the government ever took over anything from the private sector that turned out well?
2007-06-15 23:52:45 · answer #1 · answered by ronedon 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think you have lost you mind.
flaw 1 - children who don't know who either of their parents are, have been adopted. Adopted children generally have better lives then they would have had with their birth mothers. It has no effect on their moral growth or common sense.
flaw 2 - Being a virgin when you get married won't make you a better parent.
flaw 3 - Women cannot put all their eggs in a bank, only one egg a month is produced (generally, occasionally more will be made resulting in multiple births)
flaw 4 - removing reproductive organs and cheaply doesn't mix
flaw 5 - hormones necessary for good health are produced in the reproductive organs
flaw 6 - If a woman has a hysterectomy, she will not be able to carry a child at all, a uterus is needed for that.
The real solution to unwanted pregnancy is to teach our children proper methods of birth control, and to encourage their use when the time comes.
2007-06-15 21:46:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
What about the statistic on married couples!!! about 66% of married couples divorce in the world...that means 2 out of 3! so I really think you are a naive and out of your right mind.... why should we condemn young people of having children later... you better talk around you about being good parents if you are so scared about it then finding an absurd and ridiculous solution....marriage is not like it used to be ... but you do have one point is to have kids with the one you want to spend your life with but even that is hard nower days
2007-06-15 21:56:25 · answer #3 · answered by nnnn 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think you are crazy, you really want the government to control your life that much? Second off, just because two people are married when they have a child, doesn't mean either one is a good influence or will always be there! I seriously don't understand how you think this is a solution to unplanned pregnancy.
2007-06-15 21:51:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The last thing we need is a government deciding what's moral or not and ruled by religious fanatics with evil ideas like yours.
2007-06-15 22:04:11 · answer #5 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The whole concept is flawed.
Children born out of wedlock are no better or worse then children born in wedlock. Find proper studies to show that they are worse before you go on this kind of rant.
Hitler had both parents...... what went wrong with him???
2007-06-15 21:51:30 · answer #6 · answered by wickedly_funny66 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Trust me you don't want the government to be that much into your personal lives, they will abuse it.
2007-06-15 21:45:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
WHAT ?
2007-06-15 21:49:16 · answer #8 · answered by 10-T3 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋