2007-06-15 19:01:18 · 15 answers · asked by • Koala • uʍop ɹǝpun 7 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Graffiti in my opinion is usually someone expressing themselves... to them it's beautiful, but I believe it just destroys the building they graffitied on. A mural is an inspiration, a work of art that comes from the heart and that teaches you a lesson... not something you just scribble on the wall.
2007-06-15 19:04:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If it's legally done, it's a mural. If done illegally, it's graffiti. That's the only difference, the two terms do not consider any particular level of quality or the source of the inspiration. However, a mural is only considered such if it's on a wall, ceiling or other large surface, so there is a size requirement. I suppose if you started with graffiti, then later ask for permission, it could 'become' a mural (if it was large enough), but generally this is not the case.
2007-06-15 19:08:38 · answer #2 · answered by oracle128au 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
like the best things (uncommon). think of the undesirable stuff (maximum tags, incompetent doodles) makes a community appear as if no one cares - through fact it does make it grotesque. i do no longer see any the rationalization why graffiti can not be judged despite if this is resourceful (some thing diverse than all different graffiti writers), despite if it communicates an theory and has an theory (as properly "this is my territory" or "i'm bored"), despite if it has craftsmanship (maximum fail right here, yet no longer all), i think of that a graffiti artist like banksy have been given prevalent through fact he does score on all those factors. It additionally shows that there is an area for wisely accomplished graffiti, which persons can delight in despite if that's accomplished illegally (do no longer think of he asks for permission). There are additionally some situations the place good graffiti artists have been given "punished" for unlawful graffiti via getting to do a loose mural for the city - even the choose recognised they have been good. yet be honest, might you positioned the final public of tag writers even remotely into a similar league? It additionally shows that maximum graffiti writers are no longer remotely able and consequently don't get any public attractiveness. in the event that they simply had to specific themselves, why do no longer they use chalk? Why do no longer they spraypaint their jackets (I do take place to comprehend people who do their graffiti on their very own clothing, yet no longer on different's human beings belongings). What might they say if somebody redecorates their residing area to their style? might they think of that's cool? i've got under no circumstances ever felt the might desire to pass out and redesign somebody else's area. I additionally don't have the urge to tell different individuals what to do, as long as they injury no one. I do spend it sluggish and ability to beautify my residing area. If i've got faith the urge for self expression there are various different media. If I ever get my own place i might positioned a mural on it. yet one question back: might you settle to a stranger choosing a random graffiti individual and allowing them to into basically one room on your place and allowing them to pass without regulations? might that be an engaging test or no longer? might get you loose graffiti without the clear out of a image. Sorry, overlong answer, yet you asked for one, and that i do no longer even experience that strongly on the undertaking.
2016-12-08 10:39:43 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i guess when u put graffiti inside the house its a mural
2007-06-15 19:03:04 · answer #4 · answered by booyah™ 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
In my opinion there is none.
If a square canvas painted blue is art, a typeface (font) is art, and those random splatterings by Jackson Pollock are art, then graffiti is most definitely art.
2007-06-15 19:04:57 · answer #5 · answered by eV 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The only "legal" graffiti is when it is on your OWN property - we as tax payers don't want to see it or pay for it's removal
2007-06-15 19:04:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
its just a matter of whos opinion its all graffiti & rubbish to me
2007-06-15 19:04:50 · answer #7 · answered by ausblue 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Private property.
2007-06-15 19:03:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
graffiti in the ghetto, mural in the 'burbs...
2007-06-15 19:03:41 · answer #9 · answered by just curious 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Before the painting begins. If I don't want it on my wall then its trash before they started, regardless of its significance to the artist.
2007-06-15 19:03:24 · answer #10 · answered by Meatball ;) 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋