Courts should not send young computer criminals to jail. Do you agree?

Answer 1

I agree. Courts should send them to camp, where they'll be forced to spend an entire summer in outdoor activities with no computer. Best way to fix computer criminals is to force them to live in the real world.

If that doesn't turn them around, --then-- let 'em spend a few years behind bars with the big boys to learn some valuable social skills.

Answer 2

Why just stop at computer geeks then? How about letting any young person get away with a crime they have committed. I do not agree with your statement, even if it is a computer criminal, you have to remember, some of today's serial killers started out small like torturing animals. If you can't do the time, then don't the crime. This goes for juveniles as well.

Answer 3

Why, because they're young, because they used computers to break the law, or because they're not really criminals? Your logic here is either mysterious or simply missing.

Every case has to be tried individually, and each penalty needs to be weighed by the judge against the facts at hand. To generalize that they shouldn't go to jail is just as ridiculous as saying they should all go to jail.

Answer 4

"If a baby does some dreadful act it shows that something very stressful has long gone incorrect of their upbringing, their kin and their education," stated Mr Allen. Unfortunetly he isnt a techniques off yet what he comfortably disregarded develop into the certainty that if do gooder's allowed determine's the remarkable to be parents with out concern of retribution from baby secure practices and the court docket's on fake abuse allegations that the youngster may be attentive to and understand incorrect from appropriate and can be attentive to the ends up of their strikes previous to time. In Australia we seem going the alternative way around , a pre-teenager , teen can ruin right into a pub , thieve 5000 funds quite worth of alcahol and ruin glasses then walk out with basically stressful some slap on the wrist and maybe a 1500 greenback nice whether this is their 1st offence , whether this is their 2d offence this is the comparable and the third offence and 5th , getting my component? this is extra ordinary for a decide to imprison an person then this is a baby below the age of 17 as a results of fact they only have not got the money to facilitate the juevenile detention centres or guy them. If the pre-teenager / teenager can no longer pay then the determine is placed in the previous the court docket and ordered to pay and that they now decide to herald a clean regulation that states in the journey that your baby stuff's up like using a vehicle like a hoon and crashes into an harmless via stander or harmless driver of yet another vehicle then the parents will serve the time in penal complex , thats going to teach the infants plenty appropriate? incorrect it in simple terms shows that in the event that they stuff up mom and dad bail them out or pay the outcomes.Dont believe me google the justice equipment in Australia and the hot regulations their wishing to enforce.

Answer 5

Correct. These criminals should be given awards and their names should be recommended for Nobel prize.

Don't you have any conscience? Suppose these people took money out of your or some of your relatives account will you keep quiet?
Are you one of them since you are supporting them?

Answer 6

Depends on what they do. If they are using computers to commit fraud by hacking, yes, send them to jail.

Answer 7

Well what is your reasoning? How young is young? How can we form an opinion when you have nothing to say on the matter or even elaborate on?

Answer 8

The statement is soft on criminals.

I do not agree with the statement.

All criminals should serve jail time, however it should be a very short stay.

While there they should be sterilized, have their hands amputated, have they eyes gouged out with hot pokers.

Then instead of housing them they should be air-dropped into Iran, Iraq or Afghanistan with 5 MRE's tied around their ankles.

If we did this with all criminals, we would have less criminals in our prison system. It would also give would-be criminals something to think about before they committed a crime.

I for one am not soft on crime. It makes me sick that the Sheriff in Orange County, California has to house 22,000 inmates. You might have heard of one of them: Paris Hilton.

Answer 9

breaking the law is still breaking the law. they should be sentenced the same as a fast food worker would be, just because they have a skill does not exclude them from following the laws

Answer 10

No, criminals are criminals...if they are youthful (under 18) send 'em to juvie...