...having a fascist agenda? Or whatever the critisism of the network is? It just seems like another news channel to me.
2007-06-15 16:13:33 · 3 answers · asked by SpacemanSpliff 3 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
I think that just shows that Fox News is ignorant, and not open to new ideas. If they really didn't want people to be influenced by Ron Paul, they would have just censored everything he said, or edited him out or something, and not given him any airtime. Similiar to what Yahoo is doing- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VjSV7TauO1w&NR=1 The point is that this is characteristic of most, if not all major news sources, not just Fox News.
2007-06-15 20:26:53 · update #1
This may help shed a little more light on this. Watch these:
Video #1 actual footage from the candidates debates (on Fox, no less!):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AD7dnFDdwu0
OK, now go to video two
Video #2 how fox reported on this part of the candidates debate which fox earlier showed live:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7204348286930274416&q=ron+paul+fox&total=414&start=0&num=100&so=0&type=search&plindex=32
Any more questions?
2007-06-15 19:04:00 · answer #1 · answered by Bloatedtoad 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who says the government controls the media? In some countries, like Venezuela or North Korea or Iran it does, but in the US the majority of the media seem to be against the government, but the government doesn't interfere with it anyway.
2007-06-16 00:22:28 · answer #2 · answered by The First Dragon 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The other news sources are mostly liberal, so they like to bash anything that goes against what they're trying to say, and people that don't know any better believe it.
2007-06-16 00:05:47 · answer #3 · answered by Josh B 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋