I'm an old school rugger and I think line-out battles are far better when there is no lifting.
2007-06-15
15:25:08
·
4 answers
·
asked by
megalomaniac
7
in
Sports
➔ Rugby
Its better because without jumping its more of a contest for the ball (ie the other team has a better chance of stealing the ball) Look at the percentages of winning your own ball before and after they allowed lifting.
2007-06-16
03:23:42 ·
update #1
I guess making it 'cleaner' is why I don't like it. Rugby is supposed to be a bit messy.
I'm only 6' tall and I played a lot of lock and flanker and I was usually a jumper and while I often faced much taller opponents, I have long arms and have a good vertical jump. The skill of actually jumping for the ball has been lost.
And of course there was a bit of cheating but thats true for all aspects of the game and its for the referee to sort out.
2007-06-16
03:29:30 ·
update #2