English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Yes it's true. When Fox is forced report on it you know it's gotta be true:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,100474,00.html

http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.html

http://forums.armageddononline.org/showthread.php?p=15507

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prescott_Bush

And we also have to ask why were Osama and Hussien both either on the CIA payroll and or associated with the Bush regime. Is all of this a coincidence?

2007-06-15 14:39:38 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

13 answers

because he didn't fund the Nazi war machine.

Nice try though.
A lot of liars still repeat this lie


Anti Defamation League:
Rumors about the alleged Nazi "ties" of the late Prescott Bush, the grandfather of President George W. Bush, have circulated widely through the Internet in recent years. These charges are untenable and politically motivated.

Despite some early financial dealings between Prescott Bush and a Nazi industrialist named Fritz Thyssen (who was arrested by the Nazi regime in 1938 and imprisoned during the war), Prescott Bush was neither a Nazi nor a Nazi sympathizer.

Like I said... A lot of liars out there...

2007-06-15 15:07:21 · answer #1 · answered by gorgeous george III 3 · 0 4

Because it's too difficult to care, and tell these type of things to your friends. It's a lot easier to walk into work saying "How 'bout them Yankee's in the bottom of the 9th", than saying "Your current President's Grandfather is a convicted Nazi basically". People look at you crazy for the 2nd one.....but truth is self evident. Culture is indeed sinister, and the reason why people know more characters on the Simpsons, than Constitutional Amendments. Paris Hilton is a top story, but Darfur, Palestine, Tibet....all remain back page issues at best.

P.S - Georgous George....did you just use the ADL as a source? LoFL! We're not falling for that one. I suppose AiPaC is just sent from heaven too huh? I in no way 'bash' Jews.....most Jews are with me when they say Zionism has ruined Israel's reputation, and is the reason the Middle East is in chaos. Look at a map already, and you'll see why Iran and Syria are next. Look at who controls World Banks, and Media, and you just might see why/how you've been brainwashed all these years. The system is NOT out to make your life better, and/or humanity in general. How many centuries will pass before people stop thinking governments and hierarchy's alike are here to help?

2007-06-15 19:20:02 · answer #2 · answered by rob20850 3 · 1 1

No in case you probably did some serious study you may locate that Germany in no way completely mobilized their materials they mismanaged their commercial features and did no longer look after adequate uncooked materials to proceed the conflict. conflict is Logistics he who has the main and can out source their opponent wins, this is why England in no way fell that they had the commercial ought to of the U. S. supplementing them that's what the conflict of the Atlantic develop into all approximately and whilst Germany ought to no longer stem the tide and end the Atlantic convoys they have been doomed it could have been basically a remember of time.If Russia had no longer been invaded. one ought to argue that with out the oil from the midsection east and the Caucasus the conflict might have ended quicker since Germany does not have been in a position to gasoline this is conflict device.they had to invade Russia in simple terms to get oil and that they failed. Russia might might desire to be blanketed in any attitude devised via Germany as a results of fact it stood immediately interior the path of the variety one source Germany required. Germany might have had some stable kit yet they exceeded over the main considered necessary situations for waging conflict you have got all the troops interior the international yet with out the Beans and bullets all you have are some hungry men in uniforms waiting for the inevitable defeat.

2016-10-09 07:29:07 · answer #3 · answered by zeck 4 · 0 0

Even though I am not a fan of the Bushes, I feel that this is very old news and unworthy of too much dredging. For one thing, the Nazis were fashionable to business people before the horror of the Holocaust was finally exposed. So it seems strange to blame people for their friends future actions.

2007-06-16 07:30:32 · answer #4 · answered by K. Marx iii 5 · 0 1

The Family Bush a proud history of profit through treason.

2007-06-15 18:20:13 · answer #5 · answered by The real Ed-Mike 3 · 3 0

Cons are either busy rewriting history, denying it, or proud of it! In this case, you can take your pick!

As for the rest of your question: There is a lot more going on than we will probably ever know, but "coincidence" is NOT the operative word.

2007-06-15 18:17:25 · answer #6 · answered by Joey's Back 6 · 1 1

You're twisting the truth a bit. Prescott Bush worked at the company, he did not own it, and he didn't personally fund Hitler. Fritz Thyssen did the funding, and he funded Hitler's rise to power - not the war machine (that might be a nitpick, but still, for accuracy).

More importantly, you think that people should be held accountable for what their grandfathers did (or didn't even do, in this case)? So you should be in prison if your grandfather committed murder?

You're talking about something that happened over sixty years ago. "Move on". After all, you're the people fond of that phrase.

2007-06-15 14:49:29 · answer #7 · answered by Farly the Seer 5 · 2 4

I don't know if I am concerned but it does make me think that I really do not trust the Bush regime.

No one can change their past.. but what scares me is that Bush it so Hitler like himself.. only he gets away with it with a little grin.. a joke or two and pretending that all is well.

He is one of the scariest presidents ever. Behind all that act of being simple is a brilliant mind.. not his.. Cheney's and his father.. and you can bet Rumsfeld is not out of the picture.

Good point you made.

2007-06-15 14:47:58 · answer #8 · answered by Debra H 7 · 5 3

the wars over dude. You should have brought it up 60 years ago.

2007-06-15 14:45:04 · answer #9 · answered by sociald 7 · 3 8

Get up to date.
That was then.
This is now.

2007-06-15 14:43:31 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 7

fedest.com, questions and answers