English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

20 answers

its like a bus stop
but with no buses or newsstands
a very boring place :(

2007-06-15 14:32:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Purgatory is a place made up by sinners where people supposedly go when they have sinned but not bad enough to go to Hades. They will spend time there until they have worked off there sins or other people have offered enough prayers for them. They will then go to heaven

There is nothing in the Christan or Jewish Bible to support purgatory.

2007-06-15 14:34:20 · answer #2 · answered by ? 6 · 0 0

It is Catholic nonsense. It is not Biblical. Even Pope has said so. It is not real. You have a lot of choices here on earth, but purgatory is not it. What comes to afterlife, you options are hell and heaven. You get to choose though.

2007-06-15 14:33:13 · answer #3 · answered by Ulrika 5 · 0 0

Due to the fact that these
Christians use the Protestant Old Testament which is lacking 7 entire books 2 (Tobias, Judith, Wisdom, Ecclesiasticus/Sirach, Baruch, I Maccabees, and II Maccabees), 3 chapters of Daniel and 6 chapters of Esther may be one of the reasons they ask catholics so many questions.

For the Sola Scriptura this is too bad .
In the 16th c., Luther removed those books from the canon that lent support to orthodox doctrine, relegating them to an appendix. Removed in this way were books that supported such things as:

prayers for the dead (Tobit 12:12; 2 Maccabees 12:39-45),

Purgatory (Wisdom 3:1-7),

intercession of dead saints (2 Maccabees 15:14),

and intercession of angels as intermediaries (Tobit 12:12-15).

The lesson, though, is this: relying on the "Bible alone" is a bad idea; we are not to rely solely on Sacred Scripture to understand Christ's message. While Scripture is "given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness" (2 Timothy 3:16-17), it is not sufficient for reproof, correction and instruction in righteousness. It is the Church that is the "pillar and ground of Truth" (1 Timothy 3:15)! Jesus did not come to write a book; He came to redeem us, and He founded a Sacramental Church through His apostles to show us the way. It is to them, to the Church Fathers, to the Sacred Deposit of Faith, to the living Church that is guided by the Holy Spirit, and to Scripture that we must prayerfully look.

2007-06-17 09:31:25 · answer #4 · answered by cashelmara 7 · 0 0

Purgatory is considered the place to go after you die that is not hell or heaven. It is the place that you have to spend time and decide where you will go next and repent of yourself.
Personally I do not believe in this concept, nor in hell.
I believe we all go to one place when we die, no matter who we are, and that place is good and with God.

2007-06-15 14:32:01 · answer #5 · answered by sistermoon 4 · 0 0

A temporary hell for souls that aren't bad enough for the real, permanent hell, but not good enough to go straight to heaven.

You suffer in purgatory for a while, then supposedly finally get into heaven.

I guess you'd burn there....

2007-06-15 14:32:43 · answer #6 · answered by zen 7 · 1 0

Purgatory is any condition or place of temporary punishment, suffering, expiation, or the like.

Basically, its hell. But I guess you go to heaven afterwards? Im not sure.

2007-06-15 14:33:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Purgatory according to the catholic church is the place you go to wash away all your sins before going to heaven. But according to the Bible, there is no such thing!

2007-06-15 14:35:47 · answer #8 · answered by julio23 2 · 0 0

Purgatory is what Catholics believe in. You go there to be judged after you die, it determines if you go to heaven or hell.

2007-06-15 14:31:46 · answer #9 · answered by brainychick3 1 · 0 0

The deuterocanonicals teach Catholic doctrine, and for this reason they were taken out of the Old Testament by Martin Luther and placed in an appendix without page numbers. Luther also took out four New Testament books -- Hebrews, James, Jude, and Revelation -- and put them in an appendix without page numbers as well. These were later put back into the New Testament by other Protestants, but the seven books of the Old Testament were left out. Following Luther they had been left in an appendix to the Old Testament, and eventually the appendix itself was dropped (in 1827 by the British and Foreign Bible Society), which is why these books are not found at all in most contemporary Protestant Bibles, though they were appendicized in classic Protestant translations such as the King James Version.

The reason they were dropped is that they teach Catholic doctrines that the Protestant Reformers chose to reject. Earlier we cited an example where the book of Hebrews holds up to us an Old Testament example from 2 Maccabees 7, an incident not to be found anywhere in the Protestant Bible, but easily discoverable in the Catholic Bible. Why would Martin Luther cut out this book when it is so clearly held up as an example to us by the New Testament? Simple: A few chapters later it endorses the practice of praying for the dead so that they may be freed from the consequences of their sins (2 Macc. 12:41-45); in other words, the Catholic doctrine of purgatory. Since Luther chose to reject the historic Christian teaching of purgatory (which dates from before the time of Christ, as 2 Maccabees shows), he had to remove that book from the Bible and appendicize it. (Notice that he also removed Hebrews, the book which cites 2 Maccabees, to an appendix as well.)

To justify this rejection of books that had been in the Bible since before the days of the apostles (for the Septuagint was written before the apostles), the early Protestants cited as their chief reason the fact that the Jews of their day did not honor these books, going back to the council of Javneh in A.D. 90. But the Reformers were aware of only European Jews; they were unaware of African Jews, such as the Ethiopian Jews who accept the deuterocanonicals as part of their Bible. They glossed over the references to the deuterocanonicals in the New Testament, as well as its use of the Septuagint. They ignored the fact that there were multiple canons of the Jewish Scriptures circulating in first century, appealing to a post-Christian Jewish council which has no authority over Christians as evidence that "The Jews don't except these books." In short, they went to enormous lengths to rationalize their rejection of these books of the Bible.

2007-06-17 09:27:37 · answer #10 · answered by Isabella 6 · 0 0

Book Of Wisdom
Chapter 3

1 But the souls of the just are in the hand of God, and the torment of death shall not touch them. 2 In the sight of the unwise they seemed to die: and their departure was taken for misery: 3 And their going away from us, for utter destruction: but they are in peace. 4 And though in the sight of men they suffered torments, their hope is full of immortality. 5 Afflicted in few things, in many they shall be well rewarded: because God hath tried them, and found them worthy of himself.

6 As gold in the furnace he hath proved them, and as a victim of a holocaust he hath received them, and in time there shall be respect had to them. 7 The just shall shine, and shall run to and fro like sparks among the reeds.

2007-06-17 09:12:38 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers