English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-06-15 14:06:53 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

B.Kevorkian-Civilian deaths are appalling.
Terrorist deaths are the goal.
Yes, a real terrorist body count.

2007-06-15 14:59:51 · update #1

wmcritter- the total number of terrorists in Iraq is under 2000. Total number of insurgents is 8000.

2007-06-15 15:01:48 · update #2

10 answers

well... I've seen the numbers... we are killing many...

but the real question is... are we killing the "goat herder who al-queda just straped a bomb on".... or are we killing "terrorist leaders who plan the attacks and strap the bombs on goat headers"...

because there are millions of goat herders... if that's the approach we are taking... probably under 10,000 terrorist leaders total...

is killing 1,000 goat herders, out of millions, who just walked in out of the field "winning"?

EDIT: I was probably talking more about "insurgents"... and that's the only real numbers you will find...

few know the difference between a terrorist and insurgent over there, so I would say they would have trouble counting them...

2007-06-15 14:12:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

even though it is not 0 troop deaths, that is nevertheless critically below the month-to-month toll has been for over a twelve months. it is a amazing sign. with a bit of luck it keeps to say no. What does quite everyone assume, the deaths are all in simple terms gonna magically end over night? we are at conflict. And regrettably, human beings die in conflict. And it appears that evidently like we can be till the top of the subsequent presidential term. Even Hillary and Obama have been announcing that not too earlier. handle it.

2016-11-24 23:13:22 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

That's tough to say because is not politically correct to say we are killing so many. The Democratic party and CNN would be horrified to hear that our snipers are gunning down thousands of their Al Queda brethren in a war we have utterly "lost."

2007-06-15 14:23:53 · answer #3 · answered by Lighthearted 3 · 0 0

USA started to count the Vietcongs killed when the defeat was near.

2007-06-15 14:17:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

We aren't sure. The liberal media perfer to focus on the death of our troops. They refuse to air the positive things being done in Iraq.

2007-06-15 14:14:39 · answer #5 · answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6 · 1 2

Are you looking for a 'Body Count?'

If it were high enough, would that change your mind, or would you be apalled that so many were dying?

2007-06-15 14:13:10 · answer #6 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 0 0

Last I heard (about a month ago) we had killed ~20,000 and captured ~40,000. That was the numbers from the Pentagon.

2007-06-15 14:16:05 · answer #7 · answered by Aegis of Freedom 7 · 1 1

terrorist: Those that don't run away from American soldiers?

No we are not winning.

2007-06-15 14:10:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

not enuf

2007-06-15 14:24:11 · answer #9 · answered by cav 5 · 0 0

winning what? what is winning?

2007-06-15 14:10:05 · answer #10 · answered by YahooAnswersIsFun 3 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers