Has the US failed the Iraqi people or secured prosperity for big oil?

Question

Lets see: You have 2 million Iraqis living in refugee camps INSIDE Iraq and 2.2 million living in them outside Iraq in Syria, etc. yet the US says there is progress being made??? Over 4 million Iraqis have basically decided that LIVING instead of dying is better elsewhere.

Oh but you rarely hear of the OIL INFRASTRUCTURE being attacked or compromised. Interesting really.

I guess the US government(thats the democrat/republican farce of a government)thinks Americans are just gullible.
The sad thing is that that is the case.

Just look at the stock market. Their investors keep saying to invest,invest and invest some more yet inflation is still rising at a record pace.(And I am sorry if you wrongly think that gasoline and food should be ignored). Why did so many people take a loss from ARM loans in the US?
Same reason. They WERE LIED TOO.
Wake up before its too late.

Good point
The US basically put Saddam in power and then he did the same thing the US is doing today-consolidating BIG OIL for themselves. Saddam loved the oil infrastructure so he tried to take it.
The US loved the HUGE IRAQI OIL RESERVES so they took it.
What was the difference?
The USA is the BIGGEST ARMS PRODUCER IN THE WORLD.
Iraq is NOT.

Freedom? Where?
In Syria?
In Iran?
They are leaving Iraq after years of bombing and killing.
You call that freedom?
wow
how gullible.

Answer 1

The answer is yes to both of the questions.

Answer 2

It feels like an excellent huge type, in spite of the undeniable fact that this is gigantic oil. what's the huge type on a per worker foundation? examine that to revenue from the corporate you artwork for? massive oil does not "jack up the fee to $10 a gallon", through fact they have a plan and that's approximately making a earnings, no longer approximately screwing customers. specific, they're in company to make funds, who isn't? yet, they're on the mercy of the providers, that are truly no longer a similar web site through fact the U. S. economically. the element with oil is this is greater complicated than what we the individuals who purchase it on the pump see. There exists an oil cartel, this is an oligopoly, no longer a loose industry shape. on the interior of reach gasoline station, specific, this is loose industry as stations compete for purchasers. yet, their expenses additionally count on the fees they pay, which in turn relies upon finally on the fee that the providers to the gasoline stations could pay. learn up on the ability and the relatively financial shape of oligopoly. we are frequently on the mercy of OPEC. per possibility the U. S. ought to a minimum of cut back the impression, if we've been able to furnish an significant volume of the oil to our customers. i ask your self why the U. S. does not flex that's muscle tissues in this section. i've got faith we could and can.

Answer 3

Yes we failed, and them Iraqi totally failed to keep that dictator and world threat Saddam out of power. We lost 3000 good soliders and much money, and your country suffered worse, maybe you should choose your evil dictators more carefully?

Answer 4

i guess il go with secured propserity for big oil, i think the iraqis are the real winners tho, they now have freedom