English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

She's been through a lot and knows what she's doing!!

2007-06-15 09:28:17 · 31 answers · asked by basketballgurl730 1 in Politics & Government Elections

31 answers

What do I think?

I think that you're flaming freakin' nuts.

But, hey, everyone's entitled to an opinion.

2007-06-15 10:25:05 · answer #1 · answered by BDZot 6 · 3 2

I don't know if she would make a good president or not. And we'll never know, because there is no way she'll ever get the job.

I think that Hillary will be the best Democratic candidate that the Republicans could wish for. She needs to bow out of the race and let someone who has a real chance of winning the general election take the nomination. She will get ZERO votes from Republicans, all of whom distrust her, and she will get less votes from Independents than either Edwards or Obama. She needs to decide if it's more important for HER to be President, or more important for a DEMOCRAT to be President. But I have no doubt that she will put her own ambitions first and the good of the nation second. (Most politicians do.)

Vote John Edwards.

2007-06-15 10:28:27 · answer #2 · answered by Chredon 5 · 2 4

I lean somewhat to the left and usually vote Democrat. While I do admire and respect Senator Clinton I do not see myself voting for her. One of the biggest problems (among many) the current President has is the inability to admit, and thus correct errors. Sen. Clinton exhibits signs of the same weakness in her refusal to acknowledge the war vote was a mistake. In adition to this she is quite a bit too conservative fro my taste. I laugh when the right trys to paint her as an ultra liberal. Those who fall for that line obviously have not researched her voting record.

2007-06-15 09:35:10 · answer #3 · answered by toff 6 · 2 2

She is my Senator. When she ran the first time, she made many promises and kept none. The second time, she blamed Bush for all our local economic troubles despite a national economy that was cranking. Every headline has her in Iowa, South Carolina, Michigan, etc., and I still am not sure if I paid for those trips (it's an issue). When she speaks to one group, she tells them exactly what they want to hear and uses a local drawl. The next day she is saying something else to another group in their local drawl. Some call it phony, but the liberal media loves her. Big surprise. Liberals can do whatever they please.
Her plan involves more taxes. When she ran here, she said high taxes were the problem. I guess it depends on the audience. Good luck with your vote and checkbook.

2007-06-15 09:41:39 · answer #4 · answered by Stereotypemebecauseyouknow 7 · 7 2

Hillary Clinton has a whole long history of left wing radicalism, starting at Wellesley College and building all these years. She leans right and left and centist, hoping for votes from everyone. She is dangerous....she wants the government to control our lives.......look harshly at her record, don't take my word for it.......she and her liberal cohorts have already taken away some of our liberties. If she gets to the Oval Office, WATCH OUT.....your privacy will invaded even more than it is now......your kids may become wards of the state, and ad infinitum.........she is a socialist who wants to control our lives from the highest levels of government. Whatever happened to 'government for the people, by the people and of the people' That is meaningless to Hillary and her followers. She is our Senator. and she has done nothing at all for our part of the state, yet she promised and vowed to better things here in her campaigns. All Hillary wants is our vote.....and forget about her promises......she is power hungry.

2007-06-15 10:40:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

I think Hillary Clinton is out for Hillary Clinton and doesn't care a bit about anyone else (including her family). Power is all that matters to her, and she will do anything she can to prove she has power, even to the point of selling out the US.

2007-06-15 10:24:51 · answer #6 · answered by janejane 5 · 3 2

She might make a mediocre president. She doesn't have the executive-level management skills that a president would need to possess.

Several of the other Democratic candidates would, I think, do better. Bill Richardson probably has the most impressive credentials and experience, and John Edwards is a close second.

2007-06-15 09:33:27 · answer #7 · answered by Stuart 7 · 4 4

You bet , she is going to be our next president along with her husband the great Bill Clinton and between the two you couldn't find a better team anywhere. The Republicans will tell Oh, Hillary will never win , but they are talking just to be talking. Watch the next debates Democrats all look like a clean nice dressed and they have manners and they are very smart. Watch the Republicans they dress like someone from the Mission Hope, they have no manners and most of them are so crooked and dumb and are real ignorant. Some of them are so old they need a walker to get up to the floor. Just watch you'll see a good looking bunch of democrats and a sorry looking bunch of Republican all withered and old.

2007-06-15 09:38:34 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 6

the appropriate individual for the job is rather what we ought to continually be searching for. Having a "woman" President shouldn't even enter into the equation. somebody with sturdy ethical fiber, a severe point of intelligence, sturdy judgment, a individual who's a sturdy choose of character. somebody who will encompass themselves with the appropriate and the brightest advisers. regrettably, Mrs. Clinton chosen a unethical philanderer for a husband and that left the dad and mom of u . s . a . of america having to describe to their very youthful impressionable infants why the subject remember of sexual intercourse in the White domicile grew to become into on the 6:00 information each night. you're patently no longer relatively searching for a severe answer or you does no longer have made the assertion concerning what "each guy needs." JFK grew to become into probable as lots or greater of a playboy. we can in all probability on no account understand. the vast distinction is he grew to become into the President of the U. S. at a time whilst journalism did no longer attain down into the gutter to checklist the information. bill Clinton knew he grew to become into residing in a various time and enjoying with the aid of an entire diverse set of regulations. even with each thing, he grew to become into our President, he ought to have chosen a greater effective direction! to place the cherry on remarkable of his undesirable judgement, he had the audacity to lie approximately his strikes! Please! the guy isn't dumb and he knew what he grew to become into being asked with regard to "sexual kin." I say, stay away! Write your books and assemble your funds from conversing engagements. do no longer deliver our united states of america returned to ethical lowground with the aid of shifting returned into the White domicile!

2016-12-13 03:57:33 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Hillary will do a fantastic job as our next president

2007-06-16 02:50:33 · answer #10 · answered by rp 4 · 0 0

who pays for her campaign?

the same people that pay for the republican campaigns... the same people that push money into the big news media. her allegiance lies with big business and she is a political sell-out that will say anything she thinks will buy her votes and if she gets into office will be only marginally better than bush. she is probably the worst democrat candidate. people want to vote for her simply for the novelty of having a woman president which is reprehensible.

2007-06-15 11:01:57 · answer #11 · answered by ambientdiscord 5 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers