I mean..they did win overall last night. Do yall hate them? Love them? What. Tell me your thoughts about that Spurs and/or the game.
PS: I personaly LOVE them.
2007-06-15 09:00:10 · 18 answers · asked by ? 2 in Sports ➔ Basketball
I think they are awesome. A true "TEAM". Love the ethnic diversity. They are NO dirtier than any other team (NO fistfights in the stands, lol). Ok, maybe Bowen is a bit out of control sometimes but I still think they are the classiest team in the league.
Lebrons time will come...just not this year.
2007-06-15 09:30:20 · answer #1 · answered by MD 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Cleveland had their chance to win a game in game 3 when the Spurs played their worst game of the playoffs and still won.
That told me just how much more talented overall the Spurs were than the Cavaliers.
Simply put, the better team won.
2007-06-15 10:27:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't really like the Spurs; they're bad for basketball ratings plus I just don't really like the team. All this talk about a dynasty has me in hysterics. The Spurs are NOT a dynasty. Period. Dynasty implies sequences, not a championship here, another one there. It would be like calling a chinese emperor who gets on the throne, loses it, gets it again, loses it again, a dynasty. I would call the above emperor a main figure during that period, not a dynasty. It's the exact same thing with the Spurs. In order for them to even be MENTIONED with Shaq's Lakers or MJ's Bulls, the Spurs would have to win 2 more championships in a row. Until then, they're just a great team to my eyes.
2007-06-15 09:34:57 · answer #3 · answered by john b 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think this whole dynasty talk is absurd. Yes, the Spurs have been a very good team for the last nine years. This "dynasty," however, failed to make it to the conference finals last year. Also, said team has yet to win two titles in a row. The Showtime Lakers of the '80s also won five titles in nine years, but are not referred to as a dynasty typically. The Team of the '80s, sure, but not a dynasty. Further, in this so-called Spurs dynasty, some other team managed to win THREE titles in a row. If the Spurs can win the title next year also, maybe I could consider them a dynasty, but not back to 1999.
2007-06-15 09:06:02 · answer #4 · answered by wingo 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
i think they played well, but it's the Cavs.... they are a young team and they don't have the experience in playoff situations.... I like the Cavs. but i have to say congrats 2 the Spurs.. it would have been better if it was a different team playing the spurs like the Pistons... would have made it more interesting!!!!
2007-06-15 09:34:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I love them, too. And I can't think of another group of young men I'd rather have representing this beautiful city than the Spurs.
2007-06-15 09:07:24 · answer #6 · answered by Alice K 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They are a true Team. They all contribute. It's not 1 player doing all the work. The Lakers could learn from them.
2007-06-15 09:06:32 · answer #7 · answered by iz R 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
behold the Spurs Dynasty
2007-06-15 09:21:33 · answer #8 · answered by Kobe 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i love em. i see myself being in that team and being very comfortable with the dudes, like we could all be friends and chatty.
i dont see myself fitting in with the 2004 pistons cuz i will be scared if i say something crazy i will get a nice hot slap from ben or sheed wallace
2007-06-15 09:10:11 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well they are a very good team! But since your asking about what I personally think about them... I'm not a big fan... yesterday when they won... i didn't feel anything... except i was happy for Finley...that's about it... it didn't feel right... for some reason... i guess me being a die heart cavs fan could be the reason...but... no i don't like them.
2007-06-15 10:10:32 · answer #10 · answered by Cavs in '09 ♥ Hurry Back BEN 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋