2007-06-15 08:25:43 · 28 answers · asked by ShaunAverett 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Only if you are a liberal which would be the side she would represent. In reality Hillary Clinton would be ineffective as president. She is trying to hide her liberal slant in order to have a chance, but if elected she would quickly return her roots. The vast majority of the people would not embrace her ideas. I suspect that even if she had a Democratic Congress to back her that she would not accomplish much either way. It doesn't really matter though because this woman's chances of being elected are about as good as mine for winning the lottery. The reason for this is two-fold. The first is that she becomes very shrill when challenged on anything and if she wins the nomination she will be challenged often and this never plays well with the voting public. The second is that she has too much open negative history that will return to haunt her if she wins the nomination.
2007-06-15 08:39:47 · answer #1 · answered by Bryan 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes. She has the intelligence, experience and a great command of the issues effecting our nation. Two things will prevent Hillary from being a great President:
* She's too cautious to make the necessary bold moves.
* The cons will be out to destroy her from day one and will never give her a chance.
2007-06-15 15:39:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
She could be no worse than Bush but I think she is too wishy washy for me. I am thinking of Thompson. The turning point is the war. If no Republican comes up with a swift way to end the war in Iraq and the Democrats nominate Hillary I will vote for her.
2007-06-15 15:39:36 · answer #3 · answered by Dani 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I think once she was in the White House she'd do a good job. I prefer other candidates, mostly because of her vote in favor of the invasion of Iraq.
2007-06-15 15:38:14 · answer #4 · answered by ? 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
i don't know i think she has some potential i think she needs to give up some ground and move more to the right she lives in country not just of liberals if she wants to be our president she needs to be a president of all the people I think she has it in her the only thing i find attractive about her is her faith it is very strong
2007-06-15 15:35:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I f you define good by meaning the following:
1. Socialize medicine paid for by the middle classs
2. Higher tax rates across the board to pay for more welfare for the lazy.
3. Kissing of the terrorist butts.
4. More of the scandals that ruled the first Clinton Admin.
Then YES
2007-06-15 15:31:07 · answer #6 · answered by LIL_TXN 4 · 4⤊ 5⤋
no!
I think she's kind of delusional. I was watching the democratic debates on CNN the other day...her ideas for "Universal Healthcare" are rele far fetched. Yeah it sounds like somewhat of a good idea but it would never work. Wake up! Take a reality pill.
2007-06-15 15:35:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Like hell. Just 4 more years of partisan hackery, politics trumping what matters to the people, and nothing meaningful being accomplished.
2007-06-15 15:31:19 · answer #8 · answered by Jesus W. 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Bush has set the bar really low. If she goes fishing everyday she could beat him out.
RJ
2007-06-15 15:34:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
No. She would be the biggest mistake America has ever made in the history of the nation.
2007-06-15 15:33:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋