Because, at the time of its signing, he was an Army General not a statesman.
2007-06-15 07:00:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
He wasn't part of drafting the declaration.
Hell, John Hancock was one of only two people who actually signed it on the first day. some of those signatures were literally added a decade later.
2007-06-15 07:02:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because he was not a member of the 56 delegates that drafted and constructed the doccument. He was not there and was not considered much of an intellectual.
2007-06-15 07:10:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by booman17 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
He was a too busy winning the war of indenpendence.
2007-06-15 07:06:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
He was a general at that time... not a member of the colonial legislature.
2007-06-15 07:00:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He wasn't a state representitive.. he was a general in the army.
2007-06-15 07:00:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He did didn't he? or was he not there until the war or he didn't help.
2007-06-15 07:01:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋