IT WAS THE WORST FINALS EVER!
2007-06-15 05:38:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by King Alp_HBK Fan 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
This was the worst finals, San Antonio need
to play a better team the NBA should have gave
the Spurs the NBA championship after the Cavs
beat the Pistons because the Cavs cant play at
the same level of the Spurs. The Spurs need a better
team to play against (Bulls, Pistons) for there 4th
Championship to mean anything.
2007-06-15 05:58:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by Big Joey 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
I barely watched any of the NBA playoffs or finals this year. Once Dallas was out, I didn't care. I think we all knew the Spurs were going to win. They have a stronger team, with more than one superstar on it. The Cavs lost because it was all about Lebron. All the media, the city, the fans, and even the team in a way put all this on him. And did you see the way the Spurs were all over him in the Finals. Honestly if it was the Lebron show, I think the Cavs would have had a better chance.
2007-06-15 05:58:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by thathockeychick23 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Gucci: the cavs had a few bad nights? Sorry, but how about 4 bad nights? I'm obviously a spurs fan, and even I thought Cavs might win a game. There is nothing "lucky" about the spurs winning this championship--the Cavs had a cakewalk all the way through. Final point is Spurs were the better team and they won!
2007-06-15 05:50:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by GoSpurs! 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
I hate the fact that they won it, in my Personnel opinion they should not have even been there. They got every single call in the post season and they basically cheated Phoenix out of what was there's. I am a pretty loyal NBA fan but I watched maybe a whole game this whole series. Why watch when you know what is going to happen? Look at game 3 Lebron was clearly hacked on the last shot of the game in front of a ref and they just let it go. And how about Tony Parker running around with his little France Flag?
2007-06-15 05:33:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by jeremy t 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I didn't think it was the worst. It was probably one of the best defensive games ever played in the finals because it was one of the LOWEST scoring games in history.
San Antonio was the veteran team, they'd been to the finals before and won. Cleveland was a newcomer to a final series, first one they had in franchise history.
Next year will be different.
2007-06-15 05:36:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by alwaysbombed 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
If Lebron won, we would all care... but then nobody thought he had a chance. Nobody watched because people already knew the results. Isn't there like a 1:1 odds of the Spurs sweeping the Cavs in Vegas? You'd just loose money for commission...
2007-06-15 05:30:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by DMAN 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
no it shouldnt of ended that way in game 3 king james got fouled sa sucks cavs would of won game 3 and all u san a. fans u just got lucky @ game 3&4 us cleveland fans deserve it cuz king has been working his a** off cavs would be tied 2-2 -> now so the refs cheated
2007-06-15 06:02:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by lil_hotman_21 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
A Laker fan.. in the mid 80's?, the Lakers where sweep by the 76's.. Doc-J's only Championship, I agree this last one really SUCKED.. I can't stand the SPURS"and that Tim Duncan"... hate him.. hehehe
2007-06-15 05:40:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Actually this was the best because the SPURS WON BABY!!!!! lebron sucks and is way overrated, Obviously the spurs are the best team if they beat all the other teams , they earned the championship and deserved it. By the way we will be celebrating all weekend to bad you can't.
SAY IT LOUD!! GO SPURS GO
2007-06-15 05:53:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I must admit that once my home-team Suns were eliminated, I couldn't have cared less about who won.
As I have heard from my sports radio I listen to, they were indeed tremendously awful.
so I would definitely agree worst finals ever
2007-06-15 05:33:14
·
answer #11
·
answered by Mr. Cool Guy 3
·
1⤊
0⤋