That is her primary goal
2007-06-15 04:47:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Brian 7
·
4⤊
3⤋
Hopefully, not at all.
I suppose that if somehow, she does win, we'll see a sharp drop in America's wealth, as the rich, who can afford to move, will leave this country in a minute to protect their money...and there's nothing wrong with protecting what you earned, and not wanting someone else--who hasn't earned it--coming in and giving it away to even more people who haven't earned it.
Corporations will leave as well, presumably with Exxon leading the way. With the cost of doing business in America getting higher and higher everyday, we need to offer incentives to keep them here, contributing to America's tax base and offering jobs to Americans at fair wages, not Guatemalans for pennies on the dollar. Promising to take 10% of someone's profit is most likely not going to garner the support from the industries as she hopes, and soon enough, we'll all be standing on the side of the road, with our rigs in our hands and wondering why we're paying such high taxes to make up for that gap that all of American industry left behind when they were forced out.
2007-06-15 12:19:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by jdm 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
badly, I would imagine. Shouldn't we distribute our own wealth the way we want to instead of letting a woman who thinks its okay to let a village raise a kid instead of a set of married parents? One of her great ideas is to start kids in school even earlier, having a mandatory pre-kindergarten for all kids. That will probably cost a little, and take children away from their parents even earlier in life. The schools are already in crisis, and adding another year to it isn't really a solution. And isn't it better for a mother and father to teach a 4 year old about life instead of a stressed out teacher? At 4, kids are asking why? why?why? Who will have the answers????
She will probably take more from the working middle class and give it to the non working sector, and give as much as possible to illegal immigrants. Not the best idea in this day and age to stress the social security and medical systems even more, is it? If they are legal, working and documented, great! But is it fair for those of us who have paid taxes for most of our lives to pay for people who haven't, who got here ILLegally?
Look at her voting record to really find out. Since she is not my congressperson, I only know it on the events reported in Newsweek. (Don't trust much given out on the internet to be factual.) In that way, her voting record has been very much in favor of higher taxes and redistributing wealth. Not my cup of tea, thanks anyway.
2007-06-15 12:00:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by 2 Happily Married Americans 5
·
5⤊
0⤋
An example:
Hillary and Ron Paul would be walking to a Repub/Demo debate. On the way, they see a homeless man. Ron would ask, "why are you out on the street?" Homeless guy would say "No one will give me a job, and I've tried". Ron reaches into his pocket and pulls out a $20 and a business card. Gives both to him saying, "Come over to our office and we'll get you an interview and maybe a job!"
Hillary would see this and think, hey, that's great!!! but I can do better. She would reach into RON's pocket, pull out ANOTHER $20. Then put it in her purse. She would take $5 and give it to the homeless man, and say I can get you another $5 every month, no need to worry! Of course, she keep's Ron's $15 as "administrative fees", and homeless man ends up getting $1 every month after that. Better than nothing right?
2007-06-15 11:53:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by ThomasS 5
·
8⤊
1⤋
Remember Chinagate?
2007-06-15 11:58:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Steal from the rich (except herself and her contributors) and give to the poor.
She is a multi millionaire. But instead of giving away her own money to help people, she is going to raise your taxes and mine. Typical hypocritical, unethical, lying, scumbag socialist.
2007-06-15 11:54:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Aegis of Freedom 7
·
8⤊
0⤋
All that socialist weasel will do is just sign her name on a sheet of paper for finalizing legislation.
2007-06-15 17:24:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's not about re-distributing the wealth
Its about THE END OF CORPORATE WELFARE
for these companies that post record profits quarter after quarter and reward the Directors and Top execs millions upon millions yearly
got a problem with THAT?
2007-06-15 11:54:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by Deidre K 3
·
1⤊
4⤋
By presenting an agenda to Congress that promotes more theft from American taxpayers, thus forcibly stealing more money from hard working citizens.
2007-06-15 11:48:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by Layne B 3
·
12⤊
0⤋
By punishing the rich for success and rewarding the poor for a lack of responsibility.
It will never happen. The rich would move all of their money out of the country first.
She intends to make us all "equal," by making us ALL poor.
2007-06-15 11:50:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by Karma 6
·
10⤊
1⤋
She has already stated that she wants to take the profits from the oil companies. How's that for starters? By definition and usage, she is a facist.
2007-06-15 11:49:10
·
answer #11
·
answered by booman17 7
·
11⤊
1⤋