2007-06-15 03:49:06 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Because the Democrats nominate horrible candidates. What choice does one then have when voting?
2007-06-15 03:52:32 · answer #1 · answered by Brian 7 · 6⤊ 0⤋
#1 He didn't "win" the first election, it was stolen
his brother and the Supreme Court that his father put in
place handed him the elction much like he has been
handed everything all of his life. Starting with the
illegal abortion he had his girlfriend get in the early
70's, to the countless episodes he had with the law
over his drinking while driving, Including during the
Vietman War when he was given special treatment
to get into the National gaurd because his Daddy was
a rich politican, even through the period
that he was A W O L from service during time of
war, which he "somehow" got a free pass on
#2. His second run at the office was preceeded by scare
tactics to make the people of the USA
think we were in grave danger from Iraq, a story
that has since proven to be lies perpetuated by
his team of thugs, solely for the purpose of invading
a country that had NOTHING to do with 9/11
( It is a given, that the country will not change
horses in the middle of the stream meaning that
since there was a "war" going on people were
driven to stay with same President)
#3. Due to these two tragic errors,
The Republican Party is in deep doo doo
Colin Powell has hiden his face in shame
Anyone with a heart beat could beat the next
Republican contender.
2007-06-15 11:07:12 · answer #2 · answered by Deidre K 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Lack of viable electable challengers. Sometimes is become a choice of the lesser of 2 evils.
Thorgirls' Master: A point of contention. Bush won the popular vote in the last election by more than 3 million votes. He lost popular vote against Gore.
2007-06-15 11:03:55 · answer #3 · answered by Bryan 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Brian has it right. Of the past two elections, Bush has been the better of the two that were running although it was close both times. Let's face it, he was twice as good as Al Gore and and he was the better choice between hm an John Kerry.
2007-06-15 10:55:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is so 3 years ago...
Obviously the American people thought it was best to leave him in place than to replace him with John Kerry. What a sad excuse for a Presidential candidate! but don't worry, he won't win again. But for the sake of the nation - will ya'll Democrats PLEASE nominate someone that's worth a sh*t!?
2007-06-15 10:54:31 · answer #5 · answered by smellyfoot ™ 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
i hope you are not an American,if you are you have been asleep..Ms. Van Winkle!! Two presidential elections won by Bush..only two!!! I didn't realize he keeps being re-elected day in and day out
2007-06-15 10:54:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
This is because most of the Americans are BUSH
2007-06-15 10:58:57 · answer #7 · answered by Tariq E 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The people working to get him elected (not to be confused with him) are very intelligent and experienced. The Dems put up crap candidates. Don't forget, Kerry did get a majority of the popular vote
2007-06-15 10:55:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Because the incompetence out of Iraq still doesn't compare to the lack of competency of the Democrats.
2007-06-15 10:53:42 · answer #9 · answered by Frank Dileo 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well, he can't run anymore so this is a silly question, but I suppose the best answer would be Karl Rove. The man is a GENIUS!
Oh yeah, and America could see RIGHT through Kerry. Oh the trouble we would be in if that flip-flopper would have won the election.
2007-06-15 10:52:46 · answer #10 · answered by Kacey Smith 3 · 5⤊ 3⤋