English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

23 answers

Well, on that crash there are some issues that are indeed suspicious, u c the Jet Fighter was flying behind and next to them for a while and just waiting to get his order to fire, but that order never came? But the strange thing was that the pieces were spread over 11 miles diameter?
Little hard to explain.


Best Regards.

2007-06-15 03:21:16 · answer #1 · answered by ? 5 · 1 0

Why no plane parts? Simple. Because it was not a 757 that hit the pentagon! I assume your question is dealing with the pentagon? Despite what the unthinking and under investigated "intelligencia" above me say, planes don't liquify upon impact. No matter what speeds! A thorough study of NTSB and FAA crash sites will show engines, landing gear, wings and tail sections having survived reasonably intact from crashes. Engines and landing gears are made of titanium alloys and do not melt or disintegrate so easily, no matter the circumstances. 60 tons of metal do not evaporate upon any impact, period. What ever happened to all the jet fuel that the alleged 757 was carrying? Wasn't HAZMAT supposed to dig up the grounds of the contaminated pentagon site? Why hasn't this been done? Why hasn't the FBI released the video footages from the Citgo gas station, the Dept. of Transportation and the Sheraton Hotel cameras? What about the 85 cameras in the greater Washington D.C. area that are withheld, thus showing us the alleged 757 flying in the area? What about the testimony of pentagon employee April Oliver? She heard a whistling prior to the impact/explosion of the pentagon. Let's see the NSA's eye in the sky satellite images of the most surveilled complex in the world. What about the considerably smaller turbo-fan found at the "crash" site? Why won't the major airline contractors talk to independent reporters about this unusual item? Should I go on? Better yet, get David Ray Griffin's book Debunking 9/11 Debunking and read for yourself how his research takes apart the Popular Mechanics "strawman" arguments and the 9/11 Commission's report concerning the "Inside Job!"

2007-06-15 03:42:08 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 1 0

The initial impact hole was a lot bigger than that. The 10 x 15 hole you mention was probably caused by some major part of the aircraft doing a secondary impact.

And if you have ever been near a crash site you'd know the wreckage is scattered over a very wide area. In order for wreckage to be IN the hole the impact would have to have been vertical or near vertical.

An impact angle or 30 degrees or less at a speed above 300kts is going to cause debris to be thrown a very long way. It debris will skip on the ground like a rock skipping on water.

And everything will be shredded like you wouldn't believe. The estimated impact angle was only about 15 degrees and the speed was approximately 500kts.

OBTW Hollywood staged the whole 9/11 thing at the request of the Democrats to embarrass Bush. That is as plausible as all the other theories floating around on the net and other places.

The bottom line is four planes crashed that day, a lot of people died, and the government didn't have anything to do with the crashes. They didn't "allow" them to happen and they didn't "make" them happen.

2007-06-15 03:26:50 · answer #3 · answered by namsaev 6 · 0 2

YES! FAA noise regulations do not apply to military aircraft. I work next door to LGB (Long Beach, California airport). A couple of times a month a pair of F-18s fly in. When they fly out the next day, they definitely make a whole lotta more noise taking off. Also, I still remember the F-111s and F-4s I worked on in the service taking off, shaking the ground at the take off end of runway.

2016-05-21 01:26:35 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Really, were you there? For once the media was being a little bit responsible and not focusing their cameras on carnage. We had seen enough ugliness that day. Much of the debris was very small and scattered over a very large area. Some larger parts had been buried in that hole, and much of the plane had incinerated when it crashed. The media also didn't tell us about body parts, but I'm betting small pieces were recovered and identified.

2007-06-15 05:03:23 · answer #5 · answered by Caffiend 3 · 0 1

The impact hole was actually around 90ft across the first and second floors. There were many parts of the plane recovered, and hundreds of people saw the plane. The no-plane theory is a hoax/trap for skeptics.

2007-06-15 03:31:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Which commerical jet and where? What was the airline? The flight number? The passenger manifest? In what state was this "hole" created? You dont say it crashed, you say it created a hole with no debris? Was it using a lasercannon? Did Darth Vader attack the US again? Or was this one of those blue frozen waste bombs airlines jettison all the time? It hit the ground, made a huge hole and then melted, leaving no debris?

You dont ask very much here; we need MANY more details.

2007-06-15 03:08:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

Scientifically speaking, when a fully fueled jet hits the ground at a high rate of speed, the intense heat from the explosion likely melted a majority of the pieces instantly.

As someone familiar with aircraft I can tell you from personal experience that jet fuel burns at a much higher temp than other types of flammable material.

2007-06-15 03:16:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

The answer is clear: There were several UFOs in the area making crop circles, and when the plane came into their flight path, the aliens got pissed off and disintegrated the plane.

Sheesh I thought everyone knew that.

Vince

2007-06-15 03:19:18 · answer #9 · answered by vinny_says_relax 7 · 2 1

you are so right that hole was created by a giant dirt ball dropped from space by the shuttle. Stop the madness, it happened there where witnesses, read the reports and go there check it out.

2007-06-15 03:09:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers