English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

as anyone paying attention already knows, this is the end game for liberal leftist socialist oligarchs. a world without borders with certain elites in charge of a one world government. but given that living organisms have a penchant for their own kind, whether animal, vegetable, or mineral, is this even remotely possible or achievable? evolution has instilled in all living things, quite a healthy wariness and mistrust of different living things and we have overwhelming evidence that even though cooperation and tolerance between species or races may be achievable, separation is not. every living thing has a nest, or territory, or area or yard that is delineated by some method or other and guarded quite fiercely and this does not change except by force.
so, do the liberal leftist socialist oligarchs not realize this, or are they going to try and use force at some point to achieve their unattainable goal?

2007-06-15 02:43:23 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

10 answers

that is not only the vision of "left wingers" but neocons like bush, rudy, mccain, etc. if people don't realize this, and think that rudy is going to fight this kind of thinking, we are in a lot of trouble. America will be no more. I mean, its not just bush who is trying to make a north american union (spp.gov)

2007-06-15 02:49:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I just don't think it is possible to have a world without borders. Too problematic - who would the leaders be? What would the government be like? There are just too many variables and people in different parts of the world have differing priorities and needs that would make this very difficult.

2007-06-15 02:52:17 · answer #2 · answered by ItsJustMe 7 · 1 0

I think they don't need to use force to achieve their goal. They use "education." Our education system has turned into an indoctrination system designed to erase our culture and religion. It is training kids to be nothing more than passive workers. It's also promoting the idea of global crisis' , such as global warming, to prepare us to accept global solutions - i.e. one world government.

2007-06-15 02:53:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Turn on Fox News I'll be over for dinner to nite at six this time keep the front door unlocked

2007-06-15 02:52:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Some humans have evolved beyond their primitive animistic nature and lead their life through use of higher spiritual principals. But for the most part it is still as you say, most humans are lead by their selfish territorial ego.

2007-06-15 03:26:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Live yes, thrive and succeed, no.
You got a couple of wise acres up there... LOL

2007-06-15 02:52:20 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

It is possible. Amazon has a better price and quick duty.

2007-06-15 02:50:20 · answer #7 · answered by nom de paix 4 · 0 0

Do you honestly think they can run Barnes & Noble out of business? I doubt that, sir.

2007-06-15 02:47:37 · answer #8 · answered by rockstarnomad 2 · 1 0

Good fences make good neighbors.

2007-06-15 02:55:55 · answer #9 · answered by Time to Shrug, Atlas 6 · 1 0

No.

2007-06-15 02:55:45 · answer #10 · answered by scaponig 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers