2007-06-15 02:05:24 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
I mean Question?
2007-06-15 02:06:37 · update #1
If I put the details I probably get another vilolation. If I have got one I have not checked my email yet. It something along the lines of did other people have a feeling that he may have been guilty of a rather unpleasant criminal offence alledgedly, that is?
2007-06-15 02:21:43 · update #2
I have my opinions on why hes been charged and what should happen to him as a result in terms of a long prision sentence.
Violation number 3 here I come.
2007-06-15 02:25:09 · update #3
I would consider the charges to be rape(not bugary) obviously by the internal injuries of the poor guy quite a violent rape. And murder.
Also It a bit strange about simon cowels brother having some video evidence. I wonder how and why it has suddenly come in to police possesion.
2007-06-15 02:31:11 · update #4
It deliberatly pathetic. Not the sharpest tool in the box are you dear?
2007-06-15 02:33:43 · update #5
well just for the record i reckon michael barrymore has well got a lot of information on this murder. what a horrible way to die, and they should keep the overrated grasshopper locked up, cos he seems to have a nervous breakdown every time he doesn't want to remember.
2007-06-16 03:06:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Must have been a violation!
I am not sure about whether he us guilty or not - he did run away - but he has been released without charge now anyway!
And I am not sure why the police didn't do more 6 years ago either!
The last time I checked we had freedom of speech in this country still - I think that is why my father and grandfather fought and risked their lives in the last two world wars - so how can anyone sue yahoo for libel if someone passes an individual opinion?!
P.S. And I just had a slang word for cigarette starred out - it does have a double entendre - but I didn't realise they banned words like that from here?!
2007-06-15 17:36:00 · answer #2 · answered by Lady Faversham 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The problem is that the case may be sub-juidici I've spelt it incorrectly and spell check is no help) in which case comment is wrong until after the trial. Or maybe a freind of barrymore did not like the question
2007-06-15 09:50:38 · answer #3 · answered by Scouse 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Perhaps you spelt it wrong.
Either that or Michael Barrymore does Yahoo Answers.
2007-06-15 15:27:42 · answer #4 · answered by rogerglyn 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hahahaha
you made me laugh
specially with the subject about the michael barrymore thing....
i mean theres no end of possibilities from all sorts of different people
was looking through all this stuff, you know all serious
and i saw your "why has .................?"
it looks so innocent
and i have no idea what you wrote
and i dont care
thank you for making me laugh
even tho you are probably quite angry at not knowing why..
maybe you said something abusive?
i dont know....
cheers anyway
2007-06-15 10:14:32 · answer #5 · answered by tim 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Violation number 3 very likely indeed - you cannot presume theguilt (and you cannot claim that you are not doing that - your efforts to smokescreen are frankly rather pathetic) of someone who has not even been charged with an offence.
2007-06-15 09:30:55 · answer #6 · answered by eriverpipe 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
i think the police have shown monumental incompetence and probably are hiding something.
I also have my own opinion about Barrymore.
2007-06-15 15:24:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Tell us the question and we will know what you asked. Embed it in another question and it will get past the gestapo
2007-06-15 09:10:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I think we should be told what the violation notice was for
2007-06-15 15:21:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I put fcuk the other day and got a violation. I don't know why.
2007-06-15 09:08:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋